24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PIERRE RIVER MINE<br />

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION<br />

PART 2: ERCB SIRS – ROUND 2<br />

Question No. 46<br />

WATER<br />

ERCB SIRS 46 – 79<br />

Section 7.1<br />

Request Volume 1, Section 13.1, Page 13-6, Supplemental Information Responses.<br />

Shell states, “Shell is confident in its capability of design and build successful pit<br />

lakes, because key findings from CONRAD and CEMA research on wetlands,<br />

experimental ponds and pit lakes will be incorporated into the analysis.”<br />

46a CEMA’s End Pit Lake Technical Guidance Document (EPLTGD) was reviewed<br />

by CH2MHILL. The reviewers rejected the document and provided<br />

recommendations that should be considered in the 2012 EPLTGD update. What<br />

is the time limit to incorporate CEMA’s key findings into Shell’s plans in order to<br />

meet the 2018 deadline (i.e. proven efficacy of the demonstration lake)?<br />

Response 46a The first three areas of research are the focus of work currently underway by<br />

CEMA, CONRAD and the Oil Sands Tailings Research Facility, all of which are<br />

supported by Shell. While the goal is to incorporate this research into the 2012<br />

EPLTGD update, it is anticipated that this and related research will continue<br />

beyond the 2012 update, and likely beyond 2018 as well.<br />

CEMA’s End Pit Lake Technical Guidance Document (EPLTGD) was reviewed<br />

by 12 experts in various fields, and their reviews were synthesized by<br />

CH2MHILL. The draft review synthesis pointed to shortcomings with the CEMA<br />

End Pit Lake Technical Guidance Document, but did not evaluate whether pit<br />

lakes were a viable solution for remediation of oil sands mines.<br />

Reviewers expressed opinions that oil sands pit lakes would require some level of<br />

active treatment in conjunction with the planned passive treatment. Although<br />

Shell is confident that pit lakes will function as planned, several active treatment<br />

methods are available and could be used in the event that such technology is<br />

deemed necessary (see the response to SIR 312 in the May 2009 <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

<strong>Mine</strong>, Supplemental Information, Volume 1, Section 13).<br />

The synthesis report pointed to four main areas of research that should be<br />

addressed:<br />

• the toxicity of naphthenic acids and other hydrocarbon contaminants<br />

• lake modelling<br />

• active management<br />

April 2010 Shell Canada Limited 7-1<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!