24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WATER AENV SIRS 15 – 43<br />

Question No. 19<br />

Request Volume 2, SIR 297, Page 21-51.<br />

Section 12.1<br />

Shell describes details of previous experience with successfully mitigating pit<br />

lake waters, those design and monitoring objectives that will be integrated into<br />

pit management planning to achieve timely mitigation of pit waters, best case<br />

time frames for pit water mitigation, and the state of current research that Shell<br />

will use to prevent pit waters from potentially becoming methanogenic. Shell<br />

states that modeling has been completed to confirm that the residence time will<br />

be sufficient to biodegrade organic constituents to acceptable levels based upon<br />

conservative degradation rates.<br />

19a What were the maximum residence times used in the pit lakes modeling?<br />

Response 19a Pit lake residence times are presented in EIA, Volume 4B, Appendix 4-2,<br />

Table 21. The residence times for the <strong>Pierre</strong> North Pit Lake and the <strong>Pierre</strong> South<br />

Pit Lake are one and 10 years, respectively. The residence time for the <strong>Pierre</strong><br />

South Pit Lake is presented in Table 21 as eight years in the upstream cell and<br />

two years in the downstream cell, for a total residence time in the lake of 10<br />

years.<br />

Request 19b What are the conservative degradation rates used for each organic constituent of<br />

concern, providing reference citations for similar climate environmental<br />

settings?<br />

Response 19b The conservative degradation rates used in the pit lake modelling are presented in<br />

EIA, Volume 4B, Appendix 4-2, Table 42, and the respective source references<br />

listed in the table are in EIA, Volume 4B, Appendix 4-2, Section 4. Decay rates<br />

were corrected for temperature to account for slower decay in cold, northern<br />

lakes.<br />

The aerobic decay rates applied to lakes and wetlands for ammonia, sulphide,<br />

acute toxicity and chronic toxicity are the slowest of the rates derived from<br />

available field research studies conducted on process-affected waters from oil<br />

sands operators.<br />

The aerobic decay rate listed for total phenolics is based on the slowest rate of<br />

degradation for phenol in studies listed in the CHEMFATE database (SRC 2007).<br />

Field-based studies listed in CHEMFATE have associated decay rates that vary<br />

from 28 y -1 at 21ºC for an estuarine river in Georgia (Lee and Ryan 1979) to<br />

3,152 y -1 for in-situ waters spiked with phenol in the St. Lawrence <strong>River</strong><br />

downstream of oil refinery wastewater outfalls (Visser et al. 1977).<br />

Tainting potential decay rates are based on decay of ethylbenzene. The aerobic<br />

decay rate of 2.3 y -1 is derived from observed persistence of ethylbenzene in<br />

shallow groundwaters monitored in the Netherlands (Zoetman et al. 1980), which<br />

12-18 Shell Canada Limited April 2010<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!