24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WATER AENV SIRS 15 – 43<br />

Question No. 21<br />

Request Volume 2, SIR 288, Page 21-39.<br />

Section 12.1<br />

Shell states that streams outside the disturbance footprint will have a 100-m<br />

setback distance.<br />

21a Clarify if ephemeral watercourses were considered and included in this setback<br />

criterion.<br />

Response 21a As per the response to the May 2009 <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Supplemental<br />

Information, Volume 2, SIR 288, a 100 m setback will be maintained for streams<br />

around the periphery of the disturbance footprint. For this project, these streams<br />

are limited to constructed diversion channels adjacent to the main <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

<strong>Mine</strong> footprint, such as the <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> diversion, which would maintain the 100<br />

m setback. Ephemeral watercourses were considered because ephemeral streams<br />

located around the periphery of the project footprint would be directed into the<br />

diversion channels, which will have the 100 m setback.<br />

Question No. 22<br />

Request Volume 2, SIR 289a, Page 21-40.<br />

Shell states that the Actual Evapotranspiration (AET) is estimated based on<br />

actual evapotranspiration simulated for natural areas using the Hydrologic<br />

Simulation Program Fortran (HSPF) model. The HSPF model determines an<br />

estimated AET based on an estimate of PET (potential evapotranspiration) and<br />

five other primary factors (HSPF subroutines). It is not clear how Shell<br />

estimated AET based on a simulated AET without first having PET estimates,<br />

accurate and reliable water storage values, and an adjustment for advective<br />

winds.<br />

22a Briefly describe the steps that provided input data, estimated PET, and<br />

calculated AET.<br />

Response 22a The steps used to estimate potential evapotranspiration (PET) using Morton’s<br />

evaporation model and actual evapotranspiration (AET) using HSPF, and the<br />

input data required for these models are as follows:<br />

• Morton’s Evaporation model is used to determine Potential<br />

Evapotranspiration (PET), areal actual evapotranspiration, potential lake<br />

evaporation (PE), and actual lake evaporation. The input to Morton’s<br />

Evaporation model includes mean annual precipitation, monthly mean wind<br />

speed, monthly mean relative humidity or dew point temperature, and<br />

monthly mean solar radiation data recorded at the Fort McMurray Airport<br />

climate station from 1954 to 2006.<br />

April 2010 Shell Canada Limited 12-23<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!