24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PIERRE RIVER MINE<br />

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION<br />

PART 2: ERCB SIRS – ROUND 2<br />

Question No. 40<br />

AIR<br />

ERCB SIRS 40 – 45<br />

Section 6.1<br />

Request Volume 1, Section 11.1, Page 11-30, Supplemental Information Responses.<br />

In relation to redundant SO2 pollution control equipment Shell states,“The<br />

current design has an estimated component availability of above 99%.”<br />

40a Provide the overall annual Wet Flue Gas Desulphurizer (WFGD) unit<br />

availability when all the component availabilities are factored in.<br />

Response 40a Each section of the wet flue gas desulphurizer (WFGD) includes spare major<br />

equipment that is critical to ensuring sustained operation of the unit. Sparing the<br />

critical equipment results in a high on-stream factor for the WFGD. The current<br />

design has an estimated component availability of above 99%. The overall<br />

WFGD on-stream availability is expected to be at least the same.<br />

Request 40b Discuss implications to the air assessment if the availability is less than 99%.<br />

Response 40b EIA, Volume 3, Appendix 3-8, Section 4.3, provides the air quality and health<br />

risk assessment for an upset scenario in which the asphaltene-fired cogeneration<br />

unit pollution control equipment malfunctions. Additional information on this<br />

scenario is also provided in the response to SIR 250 in the May 2009 <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

<strong>Mine</strong>, Supplemental Information, Volume 2, Section 20.<br />

In summary, the predicted maximum 1-hour sulphur dioxide (SO2)<br />

concentrations for this upset scenario are greater than the Alberta Ambient Air<br />

Quality Objective (AAAQO) of 450 µg/m³. The likelihood of exceeding the<br />

AAAQO outside developed areas during an event is 3.8%. This does not take<br />

into account the likelihood of the event actually occurring. The maximum<br />

predicted 1-hour SO2 concentrations are above the AAAQO at Cabins H and K<br />

with a likelihood of exceedance of 0.07% and 0.06%, respectively. While these<br />

concentrations are high and could result in adverse health effects, the likelihood<br />

of this upset event occurring is low, as Shell has committed to redundant SO2<br />

pollution control equipment. In addition, the duration of these impacts is<br />

expected to be brief, because if the pollution control equipment were to fail,<br />

operations personnel would react quickly and switch the fuel for the asphaltenefired<br />

cogeneration unit to natural gas within 15 minutes.<br />

April 2010 Shell Canada Limited 6-1<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!