24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TERRESTRIAL AENV SIRS 44 – 78<br />

Section 13.1<br />

Request 44d How do they compare to the reconstructed profiles described in the Closure,<br />

Conservation, and Reclamation Plan for the <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> Mining Area (EIA<br />

Volume 5, Appendix 5-2, Section 2.4.5, Page 61, and Figure 10, Page 63)?<br />

Response 44d Since the reconstructed profiles were not discussed in the personal<br />

communication of July 2008, Shell cannot compare the profiles in Figure 10 of<br />

the EIA. The research referred to in this personal communication is the Nutrient<br />

Biogeochemistry II project currently being conducted through CONRAD. The<br />

results of this study are not available for public disclosure.<br />

Request 44e Based on the age and Land Capability Class of these juvenile profiles and a<br />

comparison of reconstructed profiles, discuss Shell’s assumptions and knowledge<br />

that equivalent capability will be achieved within the 80 year timeframe<br />

discussed in the original EIA, using the reconstruction profiles proposed in the<br />

Closure, Conservation, and Reclamation Plan for the <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> Mining Area.<br />

Response 44e Considering the degree of profile development on direct placement, peat-mineral<br />

mix areas after only 20 to 30 years, it is reasonable to expect that soil profile<br />

development will continue to evolve to a soil profile typical of the region. Shell<br />

expects that equivalent land capability will be achieved for similar profiles within<br />

the 80-year time frame, as discussed in the EIA, as well as incorporating<br />

advances in soil salvage and handling approaches through adaptive management.<br />

Question No. 45<br />

Request Volume 2, SIR 415, Page 21-31.<br />

This question was asked in the list of SIR 1 questions, but the reference provided<br />

(Shell EIA Update Report, Appendix II, Section 2.4.1 and 2.4.2, Table 20 and 21)<br />

was for the Jackpine <strong>Mine</strong> Expansion only. Shell states that they will answer the<br />

question in the Jackpine <strong>Mine</strong> Expansion <strong>Project</strong> Supplemental Information, but<br />

the question is applicable to both the <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> and Jackpine Expansion<br />

<strong>Mine</strong> areas and, as such, requires an answer for the <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> <strong>Project</strong> as<br />

well. The <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> reference is: Volume 5, Appendix 5-2, Section 2.4.1<br />

and 2.4.2, Table10 and 11. Tables 10 and 11 outline the criteria to be used for<br />

determining the suitability of salvageable upland surface soils and subsoil for<br />

reclamation purposes, but it is unclear how Shell will be applying these ratings<br />

to additional data collected during soil salvage operations, or if they will be<br />

relying on the data collected during the Soil and Terrain ESR.<br />

45a Provide a response to SIR 415 in regards to <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>.<br />

Response 45a Professional agrologists and pedologists from Paragon Consulting Ltd. and Shell<br />

Albian Sands carry out monitoring programs to sample soil quality for<br />

13-2 Shell Canada Limited April 2010<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!