24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AIR AENV SIRS 6 – 14<br />

Section 11.1<br />

Request 8b Shell states Overall, the results show that the maximum NO2 predictions near the<br />

major NOx emissions sources using ARM are lower than the OLM results. Based<br />

on the application of the OLM formulation as noted in Table 1, this statement<br />

should be corrected to allow a complete assessment of this component of the EIA.<br />

Response 8b The ambient ratio method (ARM) formula is provided in EIA Volume 3,<br />

Appendix 3-8, Section 2.3.5 and was applied to each model hour. The formula is<br />

provided below for reference.<br />

Syncrude North<br />

where:<br />

<strong>Mine</strong><br />

[ NO<br />

[NO2] = nitrogen dioxide concentration [ppm]<br />

2 −0.<br />

608<br />

= 0.<br />

100×<br />

[ NO ]<br />

[ NO ]<br />

X<br />

X<br />

[NOx] = oxides of nitrogen concentration [ppm]<br />

April 2010 Shell Canada Limited 11-5<br />

CR029<br />

]<br />

The ozone limiting factor (OLM) formula from the Air Quality Model Guideline<br />

(AENV 2003) is as follows:<br />

If [O3] > 0.9x[NOx] then [NO2] = [NOx]<br />

otherwise [NO2] = [O3] + 0.1x[NOx]<br />

where:<br />

[O3] = ozone concentration [ppm]<br />

[NO2] = nitrogen dioxide concentration [ppm]<br />

[NOx] = oxides of nitrogen concentration [ppm]<br />

Hourly ground-level ozone observations from the Wood Buffalo Environmental<br />

Association (WBEA) Fort McKay air quality monitoring station for 2002 were<br />

used in the OLM formula. The year 2002 was chosen to coincide with the<br />

meteorological data and modelling year. The OLM formula was applied by<br />

matching the hourly NOx predictions with the hourly monitored ozone<br />

concentrations.<br />

Since the background ozone concentrations and the predicted NOx concentrations<br />

vary by hour, it is not feasible to show calculations for every hour; however,<br />

example values are shown in Table AENV 8-1. These sample calculations show<br />

that either the OLM or the ARM method can produce higher NO2 predictions<br />

based on the hourly NOx and ozone concentrations. However, based on the<br />

results in the May 2009 <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Supplemental Information, Volume 2,<br />

SIR 244, Tables 244-1 to 244-3, the ARM-based 1-hour and 24-hour NO2<br />

predictions are consistently lower than those derived from the OLM when<br />

considering locations near the major NOx sources (e.g., active mine areas).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!