24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TERRESTRIAL AENV SIRS 44 – 78<br />

Reference<br />

Section 13.1<br />

reclamation salvage programs. Reclamation suitability ratings are correlated to<br />

the soil and terrain mapping by the monitoring personnel and implemented<br />

during the direction of soil salvage operations. Operational scale assessments of<br />

reclamation suitability are confirmed using soil classification (soil series) and<br />

texture as guiding principles.<br />

As described in the response to the December 2009 Jackpine <strong>Mine</strong> Expansion,<br />

Supplemental Information, Volume 2, SIR 383a, soil salvage planning includes<br />

soil test pitting sample collection and lab analysis (in addition to field tests for<br />

calcareous materials, texture and pH) during the 100 m by 100 m test pitting<br />

process carried out one year ahead of salvage activities. The test pits are typically<br />

up to 2.5 m deep in peat areas and 1.5 m deep in upland areas. Lab analyses of<br />

soil samples help to determine surface soil and subsoil reclamation suitability<br />

using the Soil Quality Criteria Relative to Disturbance and Reclamation –<br />

Revised (Alberta Agriculture 1987). Results of the field and lab analyses are<br />

reviewed and integrated into salvage planning for the subsequent year to ensure<br />

that soil quality assessments are proactive and consistent.<br />

Alberta Agriculture. 1987. Soil Quality Criteria Relative to Disturbance and<br />

Reclamation – Revised. Prepared by the Soil Quality Working Group for<br />

Alberta Agriculture. Edmonton, AB.<br />

Request 45b Describe the field methods that will be used to identify surface and subsoil<br />

reclamation suitability during soil salvage operations, including any sampling<br />

and analysis programs that may be used.<br />

Response 45b See the response to AENV SIR 45a.<br />

Question No. 46<br />

Request Volume 2, SIR 422a-b, Page 23-41.<br />

Shell indicates that they have not studied the areas associated with diversion<br />

channels C6 and C11 as part of the EIA. Shell also states that their size is such<br />

that they will not materially affect the results of the EIA.<br />

46a Confirm that there are no other areas outside of the LSA that have not been<br />

studied (e.g., diversion channel C4).<br />

Response 46a Portions of drainage channels C4, C6 and C11 (see EIA, Volume 5, Appendix 5-<br />

2, Figure 4) are outside of the terrestrial resources local study area. The total area<br />

associated with these portions, including the channel, assumed construction areas<br />

and dykes, is 599 ha.<br />

April 2010 Shell Canada Limited 13-3<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!