24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WATER ERCB SIRS 46 – 79<br />

Section 7.1<br />

Response 68a The basal aquifer is separated from the external tailings disposal area (ETDA) by<br />

overburden and oil sand deposits. Therefore, as there is no direct contact with the<br />

ETDA, it was not considered in the model.<br />

Request 68b Most of the anticipated results are based on the model simulation only. Due to<br />

proximity of the mine and EDTA to the Athabasca <strong>River</strong>, has Shell considered<br />

any other seepage prevention measures at the source? If so, discuss these<br />

measures and identify the reasons for omitting them.<br />

Response 68b See the response to AENV SIR 17a for the ETDA seepage management<br />

measures that Shell has considered.<br />

Question No. 69<br />

Request Volume 4A, Section 6.1.2, Page 6-229.<br />

Shell states, “Because of its low permeability, the buffer zone will be an effective<br />

barrier to eastward seepage.”<br />

69a Were seismic surveys performed to assess other geological features such as<br />

conduit paths, faults and deep channels which might enhance contaminant flow?<br />

What are the contingency plans in case such features exist?<br />

Response 69a Seismic surveys have not been conducted but it is unlikely that a large-scale<br />

geological feature exists in the mining area if it has not already been identified by<br />

core hole drilling in the mining area.<br />

Question No. 70<br />

If such geological features are identified in future detailed drilling programs for<br />

the <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> area, Shell will assess the effects of such features on the<br />

low-permeability buffer zone and implement mitigation measures as appropriate.<br />

One such measure includes installing low permeability barriers, as described in<br />

EIA, Volume 4A, Section 6.3.6.2, page 6-237.<br />

Request Volume 4A, Section 6.1.4, Page 6-350.<br />

Shell states, “Therefore, the general water quality issues and potential mitigation<br />

for the <strong>Project</strong> were scoped with reference to past EIAs and experience gained by<br />

the assessment team in undertaking those assessments and participating in the<br />

public hearings for the corresponding projects.”<br />

April 2010 Shell Canada Limited 7-23<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!