24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TERRESTRIAL AENV SIRS 44 – 78<br />

References<br />

Section 13.1<br />

There is a lack of peer-reviewed literature specifically regarding recommended<br />

buffer widths for wide-ranging wildlife species. However, findings from<br />

monitoring programs that have been implemented in the Oil Sands Region<br />

establish that wide-ranging wildlife species will use a 250 m-wide corridor.<br />

Although not from a peer reviewed source, these findings are real, relevant to the<br />

study area and important for evaluating the effectiveness of the proposed<br />

corridor.<br />

Winter track and remote camera corridor monitoring conducted for Shell’s<br />

Jackpine <strong>Mine</strong> – Phase 1 have documented that moose, wolves, black bears,<br />

fisher, marten, coyote and deer species were using habitat within existing<br />

corridors along the Muskeg and Athabasca rivers adjacent to active mines<br />

(Golder 2008). The setback distance along the Muskeg <strong>River</strong> varies from less<br />

than 100 m to more than 3 km, whereas the Athabasca <strong>River</strong> buffer is less than<br />

1 km.<br />

Wildlife movements were monitored for three years along the east side of the<br />

Athabasca <strong>River</strong> for Suncor’s Millennium and Steepbank <strong>Mine</strong> projects, where<br />

the corridor width varies from about 1 km to less than 200 m. The results of these<br />

surveys showed that all wildlife species, including large carnivores and large<br />

ungulates, used the variable-width corridor (Golder 2000, 2001).<br />

Wildlife corridor monitoring was conducted using remote cameras during nonwinter<br />

months along the Athabasca and Steepbank rivers (Suncor 2004, 2005 and<br />

2006). The Steepbank <strong>River</strong> buffer varies in size from 50 to 200 m, whereas the<br />

Athabasca <strong>River</strong> buffer zone is less than 1 km. Species detected along the<br />

Steepbank <strong>River</strong> escarpment included black bears and moose, while black bear,<br />

white-tailed deer, coyote, wolf, beaver, fisher marten and fox were recorded in<br />

the Athabasca <strong>River</strong> buffer zone.<br />

Due to the lack of peer-reviewed literature regarding appropriate corridor widths<br />

for larger wildlife species, it was determined that results from these studies were<br />

the best-available information for supporting the use of a 250 m buffer along the<br />

Athabasca <strong>River</strong>. Therefore, based on available corridor monitoring and wildlife<br />

habitat data specific to this region, a 250 m buffer from the Athabasca <strong>River</strong> is<br />

considered to be an effective width for maintaining landscape connectivity.<br />

Beier, P. and R.F. Noss. 1998. Do habitat corridors provide connectivity?<br />

Conservation Biology 12(6): 1241-1252.<br />

Golder (Golder Associates Ltd.). 2000. Suncor Millennium and Steepbank <strong>Mine</strong><br />

<strong>Project</strong>s Wildlife Monitoring Program & Wildlife Assessment Update<br />

2000. Submitted to Suncor Energy Inc., Oil Sands. Fort McMurray, AB.<br />

32 pp. + Appendices.<br />

Golder. 2001. Suncor Millennium and Steepbank <strong>Mine</strong> <strong>Project</strong>s Winter Wildlife<br />

Track Count Surveys 2001: Year Three. Prepared for Suncor Energy Inc.<br />

Fort McMurray, AB. 46 pp. + Appendices.<br />

April 2010 Shell Canada Limited 13-59<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!