24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MINING AND PROCESSING ERCB SIRS 3 – 38<br />

Section 4.1<br />

In addition, Shell expects that future energy reductions (and subsequent<br />

greenhouse gas reductions) will occur as experience from current and future<br />

operations are incorporated into the <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> design.<br />

Request 18b Clarify Shell’s commitment to use the best available technology to minimize<br />

greenhouse gas emissions for both AER cogeneration and natural gas units.<br />

Response 18b Shell will comply with applicable policy and regulations for greenhouse gas<br />

emissions.<br />

Question No. 19<br />

Request Volume 1, Section 10.1, Page 10-91 to 10-92, Tables 166-1 and 166-2,<br />

Supplemental Information Responses.<br />

Table 166-1 provides a summary of monthly bitumen recovery with oil sands<br />

grade greater than 11%. Based on this table, on a monthly basis, Shell has<br />

exceeded 90% target recovery for 13 months out of 46 months. Table 166-2<br />

provides a summary of annual bitumen recovery. Based on this table submitted<br />

for 2003-2008, Shell had not achieved the bitumen recovery as required under<br />

ERCB ID 2001-7 Operating Criteria: Resource Recovery Requirements for Oil<br />

Sands <strong>Mine</strong> and Processing Plant Sites.<br />

19a Past performance shows that Shell has experienced challenges meeting bitumen<br />

recovery requirements. Explain how Shell will meet the required bitumen<br />

recovery to satisfy ERCB ID 2001-7.<br />

Response 19a The response to the May 2009 <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Supplemental Information,<br />

Volume 1, SIR 166f, as well as the response to the December 2009 Jackpine<br />

<strong>Mine</strong> Expansion, Supplemental Information SIR 137h, highlight improvements<br />

to the original Muskeg <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> design curve regarding bitumen recovery.<br />

Shell will incorporate improvements currently being made at the Muskeg <strong>River</strong><br />

<strong>Mine</strong>, as well as those included in the new Jackpine <strong>Mine</strong> design to help improve<br />

bitumen recovery performance for all oil sand grades. The knowledge gained<br />

from these two operations will be used to improve the performance of the <strong>Pierre</strong><br />

<strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> facilities.<br />

As stated in the May 2009 <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Supplemental Information,<br />

Volume 1, SIR 166f:<br />

Shell has taken several initiatives at the Muskeg <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong> regarding the initial<br />

design, with the objective of improving bitumen recovery, including:<br />

• adding sodium citrate to increase bitumen recovery. Sodium citrate is<br />

currently used at the Muskeg <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>. The use of a chemical additive,<br />

4-16 Shell Canada Limited April 2010<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!