24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AIR AENV SIRS 6 – 14<br />

Table AENV 8-1: Example Hourly OLM and ARM NO2 Concentrations<br />

Hour<br />

Predicted NOx<br />

Concentration<br />

[µg/m³] (ppm)<br />

Observed<br />

Ozone<br />

Concentration<br />

[µg/m³]<br />

OLM NO2<br />

Concentration<br />

[µg/m³] (ppm)<br />

ARM NO2<br />

Concentration<br />

[µg/m³] (ppm)<br />

1 1,000 (0.532) 0.008 115 (0.061) 147 (0.078)<br />

2 1,050 (0.558) 0.010 143 (0.076) 150 (0.080)<br />

3 900 (0.479) 0.007 146 (0.078) 141 (0.075)<br />

4 800 (0.425) 0.005 127 (0.068) 135 (0.072)<br />

5 850 (0.452) 0.006 179 (0.095) 138 (0.073)<br />

Note: Unit conversions from µg/m³ to ppm are based on the molecular weight of NO2 and<br />

standard conditions of 25°C and 101.325 kPa.<br />

Reference<br />

Section 11.1<br />

AENV (Alberta Environment). 2003. Air Quality Model Guideline. Prepared by<br />

the Science and Standards Branch, Environmental Services Division,<br />

Alberta Environment. Edmonton, AB. March 2003.<br />

Request 8c Provide the data and formula used to generate the ARM or OLM NO2<br />

concentrations and provide an example of the calculations to verify the data<br />

contained in Tables 244-1 thru 244-3.<br />

Response 8c See the response to AENV SIR 8b.<br />

Question No. 9<br />

Request Volume 2, SIR 246, Page 20-30.<br />

The question that was raised in the SIR was fundamentally: “Will the CWS for<br />

PM2.5 be met when engine deterioration is included in the emission estimates?”<br />

9a Provide the details of how the model was employed, including but not limited to<br />

the data sets used, their statistical robustness, the numerical analysis,<br />

redundancy testing, model confidence and reliability and limitations of the model<br />

that allow confirmation of the EIA statements.<br />

Response 9a The NONROAD methodology (United States Environmental Protection Agency<br />

[US EPA] 2005) for estimating mine fleet emissions includes several key<br />

elements. First, it has developed emission factors for different vehicle types and<br />

ratings representing steady-state vehicle operation. Second, the NONROAD<br />

methodology includes a load factor accounting for the fact that mine vehicles<br />

cannot constantly operate at their maximum rated horsepower. Last, it<br />

11-6 Shell Canada Limited April 2010<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!