24.01.2013 Views

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

Pierre River Mine Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WATER AENV SIRS 15 – 43<br />

Question No. 40<br />

Request Volume 2, SIR 474b, Page 23-166.<br />

Section 12.1<br />

Shell states that before reclamation, existing, currently-approved and disclosed<br />

mines will affect 48% of wetlands in the Muskeg <strong>River</strong> watershed.<br />

40a Explain how there is a low environmental consequence of development on<br />

regional basis given this information.<br />

Response 40a The low environmental consequence is based on the application of the<br />

assessment methodology outlined in the EIA (see EIA, Volume 5, Section 1.3).<br />

The environmental consequence of the loss of wetlands regionally is determined<br />

based on the magnitude of the loss of wetlands in the regional study area (RSA).<br />

The Muskeg <strong>River</strong> watershed represents a small proportion of the RSA used for<br />

this assessment. In addition, environmental consequence ratings are determined<br />

based on the incremental change resulting from the project (see EIA, Volume 5,<br />

Section 7.5.2, page 7-94) and planned developments (see EIA, Volume 5, Section<br />

7.6.2, page 7-142) from existing conditions, including existing oil sands<br />

developments. The response to the May 2009 <strong>Pierre</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Mine</strong>, Supplemental<br />

Information, Volume 2, SIR 474b reflects baseline conditions before oil sands<br />

developments and it has no bearing on environmental consequence ratings for the<br />

project. A low environmental consequence is predicted for the RSA in the<br />

Planned Development Case based on the loss of wetlands in the RSA relative to<br />

the Base Case.<br />

Request 40b Provide evidence that Shell will contribute to reclaiming the high local and<br />

regional loss of wetlands.<br />

Response 40b Refer to the responses to AENV SIRs 27, 34, 37 and 38b regarding Shell’s<br />

commitments to reclaiming wetlands on the closure landscape.<br />

Request 40c Provide detailed maps of closure plans with wetland ecosites and describe target<br />

wetland plant and animal species.<br />

Response 40c Refer to the response to AENV SIR 27 and Figure AENV 27-1 for a map of the<br />

target ecosites with wetlands. Also, refer to the response to AENV SIR 38b and<br />

Figure AENV 38-1 for a map with wet landscapes with potential to develop into<br />

peatlands in the far future. Revegetation plans and planting prescriptions for<br />

these ecosites are presented in the EIA, Volume 5, Appendix 5-2, Section 2.5.<br />

Animal species that will colonize in wetlands are described in the response to<br />

AENV SIR 27b.<br />

The conceptual closure plans outlined above are at the appropriate level of detail<br />

for the EIA and project application. More detailed reclamation plans will be<br />

12-60 Shell Canada Limited April 2010<br />

CR029

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!