4. Discussi<strong>on</strong> The discrepancy between the simulated changes in precipitati<strong>on</strong> lies partly in the simulated changes in SSTs. The global driving model from the Hadley Centre simulates a very large increase in SST over the Baltic Sea. On average it is 6 O C in the summer in the A2 simulati<strong>on</strong> as compared to the c<strong>on</strong>trol experiment. This very str<strong>on</strong>g warming leads to an increase in the evaporati<strong>on</strong> over the sea and thereby to an intensified hydrological cycle. The RCMs that use these high SSTs c<strong>on</strong>sequently simulate increased precipitati<strong>on</strong> particularly over the Baltic Sea (Figure 1). In the RCAO <strong>on</strong> the other hand, with its coupling between ocean and atmosphere, the SSTs are calculated to increase more moderately since heat is exported downwards into the ocean. It is found that the difference in SST between the uncoupled (RCA) and coupled (RCAO) model is small in summers when there is a relatively str<strong>on</strong>g north-south pressure gradient over the Atlantic. Not surprisingly the influence of the Baltic Sea <strong>on</strong> the regi<strong>on</strong>al climate is small when the large scale atmospheric circulati<strong>on</strong> is efficient in transporting air masses across the Baltic Sea. On c<strong>on</strong>trary, during summers with more stagnant flow c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s the influence of the Baltic Sea <strong>on</strong> the regi<strong>on</strong>al climate can be much larger. Figure 3 illustrates the large difference in SSTs between the uncoupled and coupled models in the latter type of c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. Figure 3. Summertime (JJA) SST in the Baltic Sea and Kattegat during years with a str<strong>on</strong>g north-south pressure gradient over the Atlantic. Shown is RCA (left), RCAO (middle), and difference (right). Finally, it should be noted that the differences in SSTs between the different models can not fully explain the difference in precipitati<strong>on</strong> over the Baltic Sea. It can be seen from Figure 2 that even if the models use the same SSTs the resp<strong>on</strong>se of the temperature at the 2m level can be very different, at most it is about 1 O C between the models using the HadAM3H SSTs. Such large differences in temperature, and also other climate variables, must be generated by differences in model formulati<strong>on</strong>. 5. Acknowledgements This work was carried out within the SWECLIM programme. Financial support from the Foundati<strong>on</strong> for Strategic Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Research (Mistra) and the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SMHI) is gratefully acknowledged. It is also a part of the European PRUDENCE project (project EVK2-CT2001-00132 in the EU 5 th Framework program for Energy, envir<strong>on</strong>ment and sustainable envir<strong>on</strong>ment. The HadAM3H data used as boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for the RCAO-simulati<strong>on</strong>s were provided by the Hadley Centre of the Meteorological Office (U.K.), the ECHAM4/OPYC3 data by the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg (Germany) and the - 168 - Danish Climate Centre of the Danish Meteorological Institute. References Christensen, J.H., T. Carter, F. Giorgi, PRUDENCE Employs New Methods to Assess European Climate Change, EOS, Vol. 82, p. 147, 2002 Gord<strong>on</strong>, C., Cooper, C., Senior, C.A., Banks, H., Gregory, J.M., Johns, T.C., Mitchell, J.F.B. and Wood, R.A., The simulati<strong>on</strong> of SST, sea ice extent and ocean heat transports in a versi<strong>on</strong> of the Hadley Centre coupled model without flux adjustments. Climate Dynamics, 16, 147-166, 2000. Nakićenović, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J., Gaffin, S., Gregory, K., Grübler, A., et al., 2000. Emissi<strong>on</strong> scenarios. A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel <strong>on</strong> Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, 599 pp Räisänen, J., Hanss<strong>on</strong>, U., Ullerstig, A., Döscher, R., Graham, L.P., J<strong>on</strong>es, C., Meier, M., Samuelss<strong>on</strong>, P. and Willén, U. 2003. GCM driven simulati<strong>on</strong>s of recent and future climate with the Rossby Centre coupled atmosphere – Baltic Sea regi<strong>on</strong>al climate model RCAO, SMHI Reports Meteorology and Climatology 101, SMHI, SE 60176 Norrköping, Sweden, 61pp. Räisänen, J., Hanss<strong>on</strong>, U., Ullerstig, A., Döscher, R., Graham, L.P., J<strong>on</strong>es, C., Meier, M., Samuelss<strong>on</strong>, P. and Willén, U. 2004. European climate in the late 21 st century: regi<strong>on</strong>al simulati<strong>on</strong>s with two driving global models and two forcing scenarios. Climate Dynamics, 22, 13-31. Roeckner, E., Bengtss<strong>on</strong>, L., Feicther, J., Lelieveld, J. and Rodhe, H., Transient climate change simulati<strong>on</strong>s with a coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM including the tropospheric sulfur cycle. J. Climate, 12, 3004-3032, 1999.
- 169 - Extreme Precipitati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> a Sub-Daily Scale Simulated with an RCM: Present Day and Future Climate O.B. Christensen 2 , A. Guldberg 2 , A.T. Jørgensen 1 , R.M. Johansen 1 , M. Grum 1 , J.J. Linde 1 and J.H. Christensen 2 1 Technical University of Denmark 2 Danish Meteorological Institute (obc@dmi.dk) An analysis has been performed <strong>on</strong> hourly precipitati<strong>on</strong> output from the regi<strong>on</strong>al climate model (RCM) HIRHAM. As part of the EU 5th FP project PRUDENCE, this model has been run in 25 km resoluti<strong>on</strong> over an area covering Europe and the eastern Atlantic with boundary c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s from the atmospheric high-resoluti<strong>on</strong> global model HadAM3H using sea-surface temperatures (SSTs) from observati<strong>on</strong>s for present day c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s. A sec<strong>on</strong>d experiment uses SST observati<strong>on</strong>s plus anomalies based <strong>on</strong> a climate change simulati<strong>on</strong> with the coupled global model HadCM3. Two time slices corresp<strong>on</strong>ding to 1961-90 and 2071-2100 have been simulated. Hourly precipitati<strong>on</strong> for the whole year over Denmark has been analyzed. A comparis<strong>on</strong> is made between simulated grid point values and observati<strong>on</strong>-based values aggregated over a comparable area. The model somewhat underestimates the very extreme precipitati<strong>on</strong>. But appropriate scaling indicates that the model reproduces the observed shape near the tail of the precipitati<strong>on</strong> intensity distributi<strong>on</strong> functi<strong>on</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>ably well. The modeled climate change exhibits an increase of 30-40% for precipitati<strong>on</strong> for return periods of less than about 4 years. For larger return periods there is a higher increase of up to 80%. In the paper we also assess the role of model resoluti<strong>on</strong>, as the same experimental setup has been applied at 50 km resoluti<strong>on</strong>, while preliminary analyses of a 12 km simulati<strong>on</strong> also will be presented.
- Page 1 and 2:
Fourth Stu
- Page 3:
Preface The 4 th Study</str
- Page 7 and 8:
- I - Table of Abstracts Title Auth
- Page 9 and 10:
- III - Sensitivity in Calculation
- Page 11 and 12:
- V - Parameter Estimation of the S
- Page 13 and 14:
- VII - The Realism of the ECHAM5.2
- Page 15 and 16:
Adam, W. K. .......................
- Page 17 and 18:
- 1 - Activities of the GEWEX Hydro
- Page 19 and 20:
eference site archive (Cabauw, Neth
- Page 21 and 22:
- 5 - Remote Sensing of Atmospheric
- Page 23 and 24:
minute averages around the satellit
- Page 25 and 26:
- 9 - Precipitation Type Statistics
- Page 27 and 28:
- 11 - Assimilation of New Land Sur
- Page 29 and 30:
Multichannel Microwave Radiometer f
- Page 31 and 32:
output has been processed in an equ
- Page 33 and 34:
height dependence of the Z-R-relati
- Page 35 and 36:
- 19 - CERES and Surface Radiation
- Page 37 and 38:
- 21 - Coastal Wind Mapping from Sa
- Page 39 and 40:
- 23 - Clouds and Water Vapor over
- Page 41 and 42:
- 25 - Broadband Cloud Albedo from
- Page 43 and 44:
- 27 - Observation of Clouds and Wa
- Page 45 and 46:
shows a ground-track of the vessel
- Page 47 and 48:
- 31 - Determination and Comparison
- Page 49 and 50:
- 33 - Spatial Variability of Snow
- Page 51 and 52:
- 35 - EVA-GRIPS: Regional Evaporat
- Page 53 and 54:
- 37 - LITFASS-2003 - A Land Surfac
- Page 55 and 56:
-39- Calibrated Surface Temperature
- Page 57 and 58:
- 41 - The Marine Boundary Layer -
- Page 59 and 60:
- 43 - Characteristics of the Atmos
- Page 61 and 62:
Figure 2. Surface stress from two d
- Page 63 and 64:
During the experiment the water was
- Page 65 and 66:
While the number of smallest drops
- Page 67 and 68:
SCANDIA will not be supported any l
- Page 69 and 70:
- 53 - Relationships Between Precip
- Page 71 and 72:
- 55 - Analysis of the Role of Atmo
- Page 73 and 74:
- 57 - Meteorological Peculiarities
- Page 75 and 76:
Baltic Sea Inflow Events Jan Piechu
- Page 77 and 78:
- 61 - The Different Baltic Inflows
- Page 79 and 80:
- 63 - Observations of Turbulent Ki
- Page 81 and 82:
- 65 - The Influence of Synoptic Si
- Page 83 and 84:
-67- Improved Method for the Determ
- Page 85 and 86:
-69- The Helicopter-Borne Turbulenc
- Page 87 and 88:
- 71 - CEOP Reference Site Data fro
- Page 89 and 90:
- 73 - The BALTEX Hydrological Data
- Page 91 and 92:
- 75 - Hydrological and Hydrochemic
- Page 93 and 94:
-77- Sea-level Monitoring at MARNET
- Page 95 and 96:
1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 GO(CLD-M) ERA40 S
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 2. Monhly mean values of lat
- Page 99 and 100:
In the case of an ideal fit, the co
- Page 101 and 102:
- 85 - Influence of Atmospheric For
- Page 103 and 104:
The largest inter-annual variabilit
- Page 105 and 106:
References Andrejev, O, Sokolov, A.
- Page 107 and 108:
On the other hand, if the stratific
- Page 109 and 110:
Cyberska 1989, Cyberska and Krzymin
- Page 111 and 112:
- 95 - Continental-Scale Water-Bala
- Page 113 and 114:
- 97 - ICTS (Inter-CSE Transferabil
- Page 115 and 116:
The subsurface flow calculation is
- Page 117 and 118:
functions only data with higher qua
- Page 119 and 120:
- 103 - Modelling the Impact of Ine
- Page 121 and 122:
- 105 - Objective Calibration of th
- Page 123 and 124:
- 107 - Validation of Boundary Laye
- Page 125 and 126:
- 109 - Simulated Dynamical Process
- Page 127 and 128:
spreads along isobaths (fig.2). As
- Page 129 and 130:
than the precipitation pattern of J
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 2. Long-term variability in
- Page 133 and 134: obvious from temperature charts. Ho
- Page 135 and 136: shortening of the winter seasons by
- Page 137 and 138: Maximum 5 day precipitation (mm) Nu
- Page 139 and 140: scale parameters the correlation be
- Page 141 and 142: similar: the locations of main mini
- Page 143 and 144: - 127 - Storminess on the Western C
- Page 145 and 146: - 129 - Trends in Wind Speed over t
- Page 147 and 148: - 131 - Wind Energy Prognoses for t
- Page 149 and 150: - 133 - Detection of Climate Change
- Page 151 and 152: Figure 3. Cross section of salinity
- Page 153 and 154: of 35 m/s up to 3 hours. Data on wi
- Page 155 and 156: Figure 2. Time series of Mean Sea L
- Page 157 and 158: - 141 - Calculation and Forecast of
- Page 159 and 160: - 143 - An Overview of Long-Term Ti
- Page 161 and 162: - 145 - Baltic Sea Saltwater Inflow
- Page 163 and 164: - 147 - Significance of Feedback in
- Page 165 and 166: Lindström, G., Johansson, B., Pers
- Page 167 and 168: - 151 - Air-Sea Fluxes Including Mo
- Page 169 and 170: - 153 - The Realism of the ECHAM5.2
- Page 171 and 172: - 155 - Figure 3. Accumulated total
- Page 173 and 174: Figure 2. Example for Fourier decom
- Page 175 and 176: Figure1. Modeled percent volume cha
- Page 177 and 178: conditions even more challenging th
- Page 179 and 180: surface heat fluxes close to zero.
- Page 181 and 182: - 165 - Figure 1. Modeled seasonal
- Page 183: - 167 - Present-Day and Future Prec
- Page 187 and 188: at the stations Pärnu (Estonia) an
- Page 189 and 190: 6. Results There are many possible
- Page 191 and 192: and vegetation, and to derive the h
- Page 193 and 194: The structure of water bodies cadas
- Page 195 and 196: Figure 1. The area of Gdańsk subje
- Page 197 and 198: - 181 - Climate and Water Resources
- Page 199 and 200: - 183 - Generating Synthetic Daily
- Page 201 and 202: The evapotranspiration is affected
- Page 203 and 204: Model parameters and coefficients:
- Page 205: 3. Hydrodynamic model of nutrient l
- Page 208 and 209: No. 15: Minutes of 8 th Meeting of