07.02.2013 Views

Fourth Study Conference on BALTEX Scala Cinema Gudhjem

Fourth Study Conference on BALTEX Scala Cinema Gudhjem

Fourth Study Conference on BALTEX Scala Cinema Gudhjem

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 48 -<br />

Measured Drop Size Distributi<strong>on</strong>s: Differences over Land and Sea<br />

Marco Clemens and Karl Bumke<br />

Leibniz-Institute of Marine Science at the University of Kiel IFM-GEOMAR, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany<br />

mclemens@ifm-geomar.de<br />

1. Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

Weather radar technology allows to get detailed informati<strong>on</strong><br />

about actual precipitati<strong>on</strong> fields. For the <strong>BALTEX</strong> area<br />

weather radars are not <strong>on</strong>ly used over land. NORDRAD, the<br />

Nordic weather radar network, is also applied over the Baltic<br />

Sea for the m<strong>on</strong>itoring of precipitati<strong>on</strong>. The necessary radar<br />

nowcasting algorithms lack the knowledge of the relati<strong>on</strong><br />

between radar reflectivity Z and rain rate R, which str<strong>on</strong>gly<br />

depends <strong>on</strong> drop size distributi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

A study of Strümpel (2001) shows that correlati<strong>on</strong> lengths of<br />

precipitati<strong>on</strong> fields derived from radar measurements change<br />

significantly at the transiti<strong>on</strong> z<strong>on</strong>e from land to sea. Subject<br />

of the present study is whether changes in correlati<strong>on</strong><br />

lengths are caused by differences in drop size spectra over<br />

land and sea. That implies an investigati<strong>on</strong> of the properties<br />

of different instruments which are suitable for drop size<br />

spectra and precipitati<strong>on</strong> measurements.<br />

2. Optical disdrometer<br />

The optical disdrometer (Großklaus et al., 1998) uses the<br />

principle of light extincti<strong>on</strong> by rain drops passing an<br />

illuminated cylindrical volume of 22 mm in diameter and<br />

120 mm length. This sensitive volume is kept perpendicular<br />

to the local wind directi<strong>on</strong> by a wind vane. The size and the<br />

residence time within the sensitive volume of each drop is<br />

measured separately. That allows to estimate drop size<br />

distributi<strong>on</strong>s and, when the falling velocities of the drops are<br />

known, to calculate precipitati<strong>on</strong> rates. Both, drop size<br />

spectra and precipitati<strong>on</strong> rates, are corrected for fringe<br />

effects caused by drops just grazing the sensitive volume of<br />

the optical disdrometer and for coincidences. Due to its<br />

c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> the optical disdrometer is also particularly<br />

suitable for measurements under high wind c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

3. Comparis<strong>on</strong> to an impact disdrometer<br />

Simultaneous measurements of the IfM optical disdrometer<br />

(OD) with other instruments like the Joss-Waldvogel (JW)<br />

disdrometer (Joss and Waldvogel, 1967) and the Micro-<br />

Rain-Radar (MRR), a vertical looking device (Peters et al.,<br />

2002), were performed at several sites within the frame of<br />

APOLAS (accurate areal precipitati<strong>on</strong> measurements over<br />

land and sea) in DEKLIM.<br />

Figure 1 gives a comparis<strong>on</strong> of precipitati<strong>on</strong> rates measured<br />

by the OD and the JW. The precipitati<strong>on</strong> rates, based <strong>on</strong> 1<br />

minute measurements, are highly correlated. In c<strong>on</strong>trast<br />

there are large differences in spectral rain rates (Figure 2).<br />

That might be due to differences in the spectral resoluti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

both instruments. The JW sorts drops in 20 size intervals<br />

ranging from 0.3 to 5.5 mm in diameter with a n<strong>on</strong>-uniform<br />

width ranging from 0.1 up to 0.5 mm diameter increasing<br />

with drop size. The OD counts drops in 121 intervals of<br />

diameter, ranging from 0.37 to 6.37 mm in c<strong>on</strong>stant intervals<br />

of 0.05 mm. Since smallest resolvable drops are of the same<br />

order, this cannot give an explanati<strong>on</strong> for the missing small<br />

drops in the JW measurements. But Tokay et al. (2001) have<br />

also reported that the JW underreported small drops. Further<br />

MRR measurements give significantly more small drops<br />

than the JW. Another feature in the JW spectra (Figure 2)<br />

is a gap between 1.3 and 2.0 mm in diameter. This<br />

indicates that the JW possibly mismatches drops to their<br />

correct size range. These are obviously not caused by the<br />

limited spectral resoluti<strong>on</strong> of the JW. This is supported by<br />

Figure 3, which shows for the same situati<strong>on</strong> the spectral<br />

rain rates for the optical disdrometer artificially reduced in<br />

spectral resoluti<strong>on</strong> to make it comparable to the JW.<br />

Figure 1. Comparis<strong>on</strong> of 1 minute measurements of<br />

precipitati<strong>on</strong> rates in mm h -1 of the optical disdrometer<br />

with measurements of a Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer in<br />

Westermarkelsdorf in October 2002. The line gives the 1:1<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>. The correlati<strong>on</strong> coefficient is 0.98, mean wind<br />

speed is about 2ms -1 , and number of measurements is 707.<br />

Figure 2. Spectral rain rates for measurements in<br />

Westermarkelsdorf with a JW (dashed line) and OD (full<br />

line) for precipitati<strong>on</strong> rates ranging from 5 to 10mmh -1 .<br />

Spectral rain rates are normalized to classes of drop<br />

diameter of 1 mm width.<br />

Additi<strong>on</strong>ally the influence of the wind speed <strong>on</strong> the<br />

measurements with the JW was investigated. Figures 4(a)<br />

and (b) depict a comparis<strong>on</strong> between the OD and the JW.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!