Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION HANDBOOK 2<br />
phases of construction will meet the end-user objectives and provide a pathway to more <strong>sustainable</strong><br />
building.<br />
214<br />
Sustainable Facilities Management and <strong>Construction</strong><br />
A Facilities Management (FM) has an enormous amount of influence over the productivity and<br />
profitability of an organisation (Hodges 2004). FM started life as a service as small as security<br />
provisions within a building and has grown to integrate the planning and management of ‘hard<br />
services’ (building fabric) and ‘soft services’ (cleaning, security, health and safety) to achieve better<br />
quality and economies of scale (Shah 2007). The formation of the British Institute of Facilities<br />
Management in 1993 gave the final drive towards FM integration in organisations, followed by the<br />
development of specialised training and qualifications.<br />
Since 1940, the fragmented nature of the construction industry has been continually criticised for its<br />
poor performance in its operations and providing value to the customer (Barrett 2008). The most<br />
documented examples include the reports by Sir Michael Latham (1994) and Sir John Egan (1998)<br />
where a collaborative approach was encouraged to meet the requirements of the client in terms of time<br />
and cost. Egan (1994) suggested that the industry is still experiencing similar problems surrounding<br />
the fragmented nature of construction which greatly inhibits the process of innovation and<br />
performance improvements (Egan 1998). These problems still abound within the industry more than<br />
ten years after publication of these two major reports. The reality of such fragmentation and the<br />
overriding aim of design, construction and FM constituencies’ pursuit of financial interest have great<br />
implications on <strong>sustainable</strong> design management and the drive for sustainability agenda (Elmualim et<br />
al. 2009).<br />
Sustainable development has significantly grown in importance largely due to EU legislation and the<br />
UK government forcing the construction industry to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon<br />
emissions (Stern 2006). An example is the recent government set targets to reduce carbon emissions<br />
by 80% by 2050 compared with 1990 levels. The construction industry poses a huge detriment on the<br />
environment due to its large resource consumption and level of Green House Gas emissions (Kibert<br />
and Sendzimir 2000, Cole 2000, Pearce 2006). The benefits of sustainability and green buildings are<br />
therefore, well established (Adis and Talbot 2001). Hodges (2004) recognises these benefits as the<br />
reduction in energy consumption, increased user productivity, waste reductions and many other<br />
issues. A number of FM involved in sustainability aim to make these savings at the operational phase.<br />
However, the physical aspect of a building still dominates the design and construction within the built<br />
environment with no considerations for in-use or FM. There is a need for involving FM in the design<br />
and construction processes to lay bare the sustainability goals (Elmualim et al. 2009). Popular<br />
methods for designing and building facilities leads to 40-50% consumption of energy produced on a<br />
popular basis, therefore small strides forward will equal big savings (Hodges 2004).<br />
Design management is considered the holy grail of sustainability. However, <strong>sustainable</strong> design<br />
management, often exclusive of other processes, is resulting in an increasing number of case studies<br />
leading <strong>sustainable</strong> design and innovation which fail to demonstrate changes or materialise in<br />
common practice (Elmualim et al. 2009). Designers should be required to look at the life cycle of a<br />
building when assessing green alternatives (Hodges 2004). The chapter analyses whether the<br />
knowledge of FM at the operational phases can contribute to the early briefing and design phases of<br />
construction and create more <strong>sustainable</strong> buildings that fully meet the needs of the end-user of the<br />
facility. The investigation will also consider the common barriers restricting their inclusion, of<br />
paramount importance is the inclusion of Sustainable FM at the briefing and design phases of<br />
construction. The research focuses on the attitudes of different professionals and informs the industry<br />
of the potential benefits of <strong>sustainable</strong> FM and barriers restricting their inclusion within the early<br />
phases of construction.<br />
The performance of the construction industry within the UK has been recognised considerably for its<br />
poor performance and the production of buildings that present high end-user dissatisfaction.<br />
Therefore, change within the industry is required to meet the needs of the end-user and provide a