12.02.2013 Views

Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con

Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con

Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HANDBOOK 2 SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION<br />

The design phase is divided into three stages: criteria design, detailed design and implementation<br />

documents. The criteria design stage main objectives are to evaluate different design options and to<br />

select the most appropriate for the project, to finalize the definition of scope of work, and to define the<br />

basis and criteria of design according to the owner’s project requirements. Ideally the subcontractors<br />

should come on board at this stage. Afterwards, the detailed design main objectives are to finalize the<br />

design and to reach agreement on tolerances between subcontractors. Finally the main objectives of<br />

the implementation documents stage are to determine the construction means and methods and to start<br />

the process of shop drawings and prefabrication. The role of each team member will change<br />

throughout the design process.<br />

For interaction between the <strong>sustainable</strong> sites sustainability criteria and the criteria design activities the<br />

team participation distribution based on the matrix is: owner 14%, architect 24%, engineer or<br />

specialty consultant 34%, general contractor 21%, trade contractor 7%, and facility manager 0%.<br />

Those percentages change when entering the detailed design as follows: owner 12%, architect 21%,<br />

engineer or specialty consultant 35%, general contractor 16%, trade contractor 16%, and facility<br />

manager 0%. And for the implementation documents the participation is owner 0%, architect 20%,<br />

engineer or specialty consultant 31%, general contractor 25%, trade contractor 24%, and facility<br />

manager 0%. During the criteria design the participation of the owner is very important to finalize the<br />

scope definition and on the selection of design alternatives. During the detailed design his/her main<br />

role is on the establishment of required quality levels. On the other hand for the period of<br />

implementation documents the owner does not have much contribution because major definitions and<br />

decisions have already been made. The participation of the facility manager is not very significant for<br />

the interaction of sustainability criteria and the design phase. On the other hand, the participation of<br />

the architect is high at the beginning of design but is reduced throughout the process, because he/she<br />

is not the main designer for most of the building systems, and the architect acts as support for the<br />

engineers or specialty consultants. The role of the engineers or specialty consultants is very important<br />

because they are the main designers in terms of <strong>sustainable</strong> sites sustainability criteria. Contrary to the<br />

traditional construction process, all engineering systems are completely defined and the knowledge of<br />

engineers and specialty consultants is included in the schematic design; therefore the sustainability of<br />

the project is optimized.<br />

Another important difference compared to a traditional project is the early input from the general<br />

contractor and the trade contractors, which influence the sustainability of the project. Their<br />

participation allows truly finalizing the design before construction starts, because most design<br />

inconsistencies are detected during constructability reviews of the design phase; therefore changes to<br />

design during the construction phase will be reduced. In addition prefabrication can start before actual<br />

construction begins, allowing a quicker and leaner process.<br />

In terms of the interactions between the water efficiency criteria and the design phase, the team<br />

participation based on the matrix should be during the criteria design: owner 13%, architect 19%,<br />

engineer or specialty consultant 37%, general contractor 16%, trade contractor 10%, and facility<br />

manager 5%; during the detailed design owner 9%, architect 22%, engineer or specialty consultant<br />

38%, general contractor 9%, trade contractor 16%, and facility manager 5%; and during the<br />

implementation documents owner 0%, architect 21%, engineer or specialty consultant 34%, general<br />

contractor 17%, trade contractor 28%, and facility manager 0%. The participation is very similar to<br />

the participation on the interaction between <strong>sustainable</strong> sites sustainability criteria and the design<br />

phase. The owner has a greater participation during the criteria design but his/her participation is<br />

reduced on the implementation documents. The participation of engineers and specialty consultants is<br />

important and is very constant throughout the design phase, because they are the main designers of the<br />

plumbing and irrigation system; therefore they should participate when the determination of scope is<br />

being finalized, the definition of bases or criteria of design and the final design of the system. The<br />

participation of the general contractor and subcontractors is very similar to their participation on the<br />

past interaction. The architect plays a role of support for the engineers and specialty consultant and<br />

helps on the selection of sanitary artefacts. The participation of the facility manager is higher<br />

compared to that defined in the <strong>sustainable</strong> sites sustainability criteria because he/she plays an<br />

important role in the scope definition and on the establishment of required quality levels.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!