Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HANDBOOK 2 SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION<br />
“Indeed, termites must live in a constant temperature of exactly 87 degrees (F) to<br />
survive.” 7<br />
“Termites farm fungus deep inside their mounds. To do so, the internal temperature must<br />
remain at a steady 87 degrees F.” 8<br />
“The fungus must be kept at exactly 87 degrees …” 9<br />
There is just one problem: at least in the nest of Macrotermes michaelseni, there is no evidence that<br />
nest temperature is regulated. Indeed, there is good evidence that it is not. In the subterranean nest of<br />
Macrotermes michaelseni, for example, while temperatures are strongly damped through the day, they<br />
also closely track deep soil temperatures through the year (Figure 3). Consequently, the annual march<br />
of temperature in the nest ranges from about 14 o C in winter to more than 31 o C in the summer, a span<br />
of nearly 17 o C. Nor is there any evidence that mound ventilation affects nest temperature. In the nest<br />
of Odontotermes transvaalensis, which builds open-chimney mounds, eliminating ventilation<br />
altogether (by capping the open chimney) produces no discernible effect on nest temperature [13].<br />
These observations have a straightforward explanation: when a nest is embedded in the capacious<br />
thermal sink of the deep soil, the nest energy balance (and hence its temperature) is strongly driven by<br />
this large thermal capacity. This produces the nest’s strongly damped diurnal temperatures, and the<br />
mound infrastructure and nest ventilation has virtually nothing to do with it.<br />
Figure 3. The annual march of temperature in the nest of a Macrotermes michaelseni colony in<br />
northern Namibia. For comparison, ground temperature 15 m away and at 1 m depth (about<br />
the depth of the nest) is also plotted.<br />
Another surprising feature involves the relationship between nest temperature and mound<br />
temperature. A core assumption of Martin Lüscher’s thermosiphon model is that buoyancy is<br />
imparted to nest air by waste heat from nest metabolism. There is, in fact, a considerable production<br />
of waste heat, estimated to range from about 80 watts, to as high as 250 watts, and this can elevate<br />
nest temperature by a few degrees above soil temperature [14]. However, for the thermosiphon to<br />
work, nest temperature must be warmer than mound temperature. Extensive measurements over the<br />
year of mound vs nest temperature for Macrotermes michaelseni reveal that nest temperature is most<br />
frequently cooler than mound temperature (Figure 4). In short, the nest air is most commonly stably<br />
stratified with respect to mound air, which means no thermosiphon flow is possible. Where the nest is<br />
warmer than the mound, the buoyant forces that result will be weak and unlikely to drive much flow<br />
[15].<br />
7 http://www.aia.org/aiarchitect/thisweek03/tw0131/0131tw5bestpract_termite.htm<br />
8 http://database.biomimicry.org/item.php?table=product&id=1007<br />
9 http://www.zpluspartners.com/zblog/archive/2004_01_24_zblogarchive.html<br />
237