Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Industrialised, Integrated, Intelligent sustainable Construction - I3con
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HANDBOOK 2 SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION<br />
• identification of possible models for affordable and <strong>sustainable</strong> housing<br />
The selection of the recent and/or progressive housing developments was carried out to include:<br />
• several South Australian housing developments which had some affordable and <strong>sustainable</strong><br />
housing characteristics<br />
• reference to interstate developments to provide a national perspective<br />
• two overseas developments to give an international comparison<br />
These developments are summarised in Table 1<br />
Table 1. Housing developments selected for analysis<br />
Name State/<br />
Country<br />
Location Development Size<br />
Inspire South Australia Noarlunga, 30km to south of<br />
Adelaide CBD<br />
28 dwellings – Stage 1<br />
Lochiel Park South Australia Campbelltown, 8km to north 100 dwellings when<br />
east of Adelaide CBD<br />
complete<br />
Christie Walk South Australia Adelaide CBD 24 dwellings of various<br />
forms<br />
Mawson Lakes South Australia 12km to the north of Adelaide<br />
CBD<br />
4,000 homes by 2010<br />
Aldinga Arts<br />
Eco Village<br />
Landcom<br />
NSW designs<br />
South Australia 45km to the south of Adelaide Currently 55 homes<br />
CBD<br />
mainly owner- builders<br />
New South Wales, Various across NSW Various depending on<br />
Australia<br />
particular project<br />
K2 Melbourne Victoria, Australia 5km to the south east of<br />
Melbourne CBD<br />
96 apartments<br />
BedZED United Kingdom 14km to south of London CBD,<br />
near Mitcham<br />
99 dwellings<br />
Oxley Park United Kingdom 70km to north west of London 145 houses<br />
Results of research<br />
Initially, the nine developments were analysed using the characteristics identified from the literature<br />
review which included measures of environmental, economic and social sustainability. Specifically,<br />
environmental characteristics consisted of energy efficiency, water efficiency, construction materials<br />
and construction methods. For economic sustainability, financial procurement methods used for the<br />
development projects were considered as well as purchase (or rental) costs. Dwelling size,<br />
adaptability (for occupants with disabilities), community acceptability and whether the design of the<br />
development was intended for outer or inner city locations were the social characteristics.<br />
This initial analysis resulted in the necessity to define performance indicators and to introduce subindicators<br />
where appropriate and these are described as follows:<br />
• Energy efficiency encompasses all measures to reduce a dwelling’s energy use and greenhouse<br />
gas emissions. Sub-indicators were energy star ratings, use of photovoltaics and solar water<br />
heating, and solar passive design.<br />
• Water efficiency encompasses water conservation, storage and water sensitive urban design<br />
techniques. Sub-indicators were rainwater storage, water efficient appliances and grey water reuse.<br />
53