13.07.2015 Views

CONFINAMIENTO NANOSC´OPICO EN ESTRUCTURAS ... - It works!

CONFINAMIENTO NANOSC´OPICO EN ESTRUCTURAS ... - It works!

CONFINAMIENTO NANOSC´OPICO EN ESTRUCTURAS ... - It works!

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Confinamiento magnético 189MAGNETIZATION OF NANOSCOPIC QUANTUM RINGS… PHYSICAL REVIEW B 70, 081301(R) (2004)FIG. 3. Magnetization of two-electron nanocrystals with increasinginner radius. From bottom to top the curves correspond toR in =0 nm, R in =1 nm, R in =2 nm, R in =5 nm and R in =10 nm. Thecurves are offset by 1.0 meV/T.level crossings in the ground state shown in Fig. 1(b). Aninner radius of R in =10 nm yields three steps at about 2, 6.2,and 10.6 T. <strong>It</strong> should be noted that the magnetization curvesare not periodic. This is due to the penetration of the magneticfield into the ring region. 5,15 Finally, by increasing themagnetic field the additionally arising steps gradually becomeflatter due to the smaller changes in slope at the crossingpoints (see Fig. 1(b)). <strong>It</strong> can be concluded from Fig. 2that the magnetization of a one-electron quantum dot ismarkedly different to that of any quantum ring. These differencescan be traced at relatively low magnetic fields, evenfor inner holes as small as R in =1 nm.In quantum dots, electron-electron interaction pushes themagnetization steps toward lower values of the magneticfield. 20 Hence, we calculate the magnetization of a twoelectrondot and rings with various inner radii to investigatewhether it is possible to distinguish them by means of fieldsthat are even weaker than in the one-electron case. The correspondingresults are plotted in Fig. 3, the curves beingoffset by 1.0 meV/T. A major difference with respect to oneelectronmagnetization can be found in the magnetizationcurve of the quantum dot: whereas in Fig. 2 no step waspresent in the R in =0 curve, in Fig. 3 a step shows up at11.15 T. The origin of this new step is the spin-singlet-spintriplettransition that the exchange energy induces in theground state of two-electron dots. 22 Such spin oscillationsare also present in the ground state of two-electron quantumrings, 11 and thus a step can be also seen in the R in =1 nmcurve, but at a magnetic field that is much lower than that ofthe dot. Further steps appear when the size of the inner holeincreases. In general, the steps of the two-electron quantumring magnetization show up at weaker fields than in the oneelectroncase. This is mostly due to the exchange interaction.Our results highlight the fact that low-field magnetizationmeasurements unambiguously reveal the topology of coveredInAs/GaAs nanocrystals with one or two electrons. <strong>It</strong>should be stressed that ring morphology is evidenced by thepresence and the position of the magnetization steps. Thisprobe can be complemented with estimates of the circularsymmetry also performed using magnetization data, sinceasymmetry leads to variations in the size of the steps, ratherthan in their positions. 12,13In order to study the influence of Coulomb interaction onthe magnetization of nanoscopic rings, in Fig. 4 we illustratethe magnetization curves of a one- and two-electron quantumring with R in =5 nm, and those of the one- and two-electronquantum dots, which are shown for comparison. Figures 4(a)and 4(b) show the magnetization of the one-electron dot andFIG. 4. Magnetization of a one-electron quantum dot (a), a one-electron quantum ring with R in =5 nm (b), a two-electron quantum dot (c)and a two-electron quantum ring with R in =5 nm (d). In(c) and (d), solid lines represent interacting electrons and dashed lines noninteractingelectrons.081301-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!