03.07.2013 Views

Graphique 1 - Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie de Fès

Graphique 1 - Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie de Fès

Graphique 1 - Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie de Fès

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[111] Webb Jc.,Key C., Clifford R.,Harri<strong>et</strong> O. Population based study of microinvasive<br />

a<strong>de</strong>nocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Obst<strong>et</strong>. Gynecol. 2001,97, 5, 701-706.<br />

[112] Gupta S., Sodohani P., Lal Chachra C. Rehydratation of air-dried cervical smears: a<br />

feasible alternative to conventional w<strong>et</strong> fixation. Obst<strong>et</strong>. Gynecol., 2003, 102, 4, 761-764.<br />

[113] Meijer C.,Cox T. HPV <strong>et</strong> dépistage : les recommandations d’EUROGYN 20003.<br />

http://wwww.esculape.com<br />

[114] Schwartz D. Dépistage cytologique du cancer du col <strong>de</strong> l’utérus par prélèvement en<br />

milieu liqui<strong>de</strong>. Thèse Méd. Genève, 2002, 10250.<br />

[115] Abbara A.Condylomes génitaux (ou verrues génitales).L’infection génitale à<br />

papillomavirus. http:// www.aly-abbara.com<br />

[116] Hartz L., Fenaughty Am. Management choice and adherence to follow-up after colposcopy<br />

in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1. Obst<strong>et</strong>. Gynecol., 2001, 98, 4,674-679.<br />

[117] Prendiville W, Davies R, Berry PJ. A low voltage diathermy loop for taking cervical biopsies: a<br />

qualitative comparison with punch biopsy forceps. Br J Obst<strong>et</strong> Gynaecol 1986 ; 93 : 773-776<br />

[118] Piver MS, Wallace S, Castro JR. The accuracy of lymphangiography in carcinoma of the uterine cervix.<br />

AJR Am J Roentgenol 1971 ; 111 : 278-283<br />

16 : 353-361<br />

[119] Fuchs WA, Rosenberg GS. Lymphography in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Acta Radiol 1975 ;<br />

[120] Darbois Y, Buthiau D, Dargent D. Cancer du col utérin. In : Buthiau D, Khayat D eds.<br />

Scanner <strong>et</strong> IRM en cancérologie. Berlin : Springer-Verlag, 1995 : 279-290<br />

[121] Hammond JA, Herson J, Freedman RS, Hamberger AD, Wharton JT, Wallace S <strong>et</strong> al. The<br />

impact of lymph no<strong>de</strong> status on survival in cervical carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1981 ; 7 :<br />

1713-1718<br />

[122] Villasanta V, Whittley NO, Haney PJ, Brenner D. Computed tomography in invasive<br />

carcinoma of the cervix: an appraisal. Obst<strong>et</strong> Gynecol 1983 ; 62 : 218-224<br />

[123] Sundborg MJ, Taylor RR, Mark J, Elg SA. Cystoscopy after computed tomography scan to<br />

i<strong>de</strong>ntify blad<strong>de</strong>r invasion in cervical cancer. Obst<strong>et</strong> Gynecol 1998 ; 92 : 364-366<br />

[124] Brenner DE, Whitley NO, Prempree T, Villasanta U. An evaluation of the computed<br />

tomographic scanner for the staging of carcinoma of the cervix. Cancer 1982 ; 50 : 2323-2328<br />

[125] Bandy LC, Clarke-Pearson DL, Silverman PM, Creasman WT. Computed tomography in<br />

evaluation of extrapelvic lympha<strong>de</strong>nectomy in carcinoma of the cervix. Obst<strong>et</strong> Gynecol 1985 ; 65 : 73-76<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!