Bulletin de liaison etd'information - Institut kurde de Paris

Revue de Presse-Press Review-Berhevoka Çapê-Rivista Stampa-Dentro de la Prensa-Basm Özeti
W "',
The Gun Is on the Table;, and Iraqis
,
Await-Their Lib,erators
ASHINGTON - When a
, dramatist plilCeSa gun on
the table in the 'first, act, the
astute' playgoer knowsthat the
weaponwilft>d'used before the
dramaends. In his State of the
Union address, George W. Bush
warned three nations sponsoring
terror - North Korea, Iran and
Iraq - 'ihàt the United States
"willilot permit theworld's
most dangerous' regimes to~
threaten uswith the world's
most destructive weapons. "
That means he has decided to
destro..}' the destructive potential
of the most dangerous states before
they can credibly threaten
to wipeout a D.S.city o~,infect
America With an epidenuc.
President Bush's refusal "to
leave terror states unchecked"
leaves only secondary decisions:
when and how to attack
"the axis of evil" ~an apt
.allusion to the Berlin-Rqme-
Tokyo axiS of World: War n.
In asctmding' order' of preemptive
priority:,:" .
North Korea 1S a regnne
arming. with missiles and .
weapons of mass destruction." .
ThèünitedStâtes has been
paralyzed by S~uth ~orea's f~
of renewed. mvaslOn despite
U.S. intelligence indica~g the
North's secret nuclear buildup"
Seoul, near the border, is vul~
nerable to long-range artillery.
This could be countered by
shipment to South Korea of ad-
'.vanced counter-artillery capable
of tracking the trajecto~ of
incoming shells. U.S. B-52s
could then take out Kim long
fi's key nuclear bomb-making
sites, whi~h he now refuses to.
permit International Atomic En- '
ergy Agency inspectors to see.
Iran is building nuclear bombs,
with Russia's help. It supplies,
and controlsthe Hezbollah ter-'
rorists in Lèbanon, and just escalated
its war on, infidels by
shipping 50 tons of rockets, C-4
terror explosive and other arms
to Yasser Arafat's army to kill
more Israeli civilians.
These acts have exploded the
myth,long embraced by wishful
thinkers at the U.S. State De ...
partment, of a "moderate" ayatollah
supposedly resisting the
hot-eyed fundamentalists. That
rosy scenario of rapprochement,
was sunk with the capture of the
:1rant.an-Palestinian terror ship.
Shollld intelligence reveal a nuclear
danger from Tehran coming
bnstream, a surgical air
strike would be called for.
Iraq, of cours~, is the most
immediate targe£. Because Saddam
Hussein has dispersed his
nuclear facilities and placed his
germ warfare plants in such
places as the basement of the
. Baghdad hospital, air strikes
alone would not meet the threat.
Despite CIA chief George Tenet'
s dislike of the leaders of the
anti-Saddam Iraqi National
Congress, and despite furious
posterior-covering ,by Brent
Scowcroft and Colin Powell,
President Bush has evidently
decided to force a change of
regime in Baghdad.
To avoid certaÜl military defeat,
Saddam is likely to send
Tariq Aziz out with "insPection
feelers" to the United Nations.
Six months of negotiation about
who (other than spying Ameri~ans)
would be on the inspection
teams would be followed by
By William Safire
six months of misleadingthe
inspectors:
By then Saddam would
have his deadly weapons - and
would thereby tip the strategic
balance in terror's favor.
If Bush follows words with
deeds, he will avert that disaster.
He will apply his Afghan template:
Supply arms and money
to 70,000 Kurdish fighters in
northern Iraq and a lesser Shiite
force in the south,covering both
with Predator surveillance and
tactical U.S. air support.
In Phase n, l'll bet it was
recently agreed in Washington
,that Turkish tank brigades and
U.S. Special Ops troops will
together thrust down to Bagh~
dad. Saddam will join Osama
bin Laden and Mullah Omar
in hiding. Iraqis, cheering their
liberators, will lead the Arab
world toward democracy. '
. It's not a pipe dream. It's the
action implicit in the Bush doc-
: trine enunciated this week. The
gun laid on the table by this'
political dramatist will go off in
the nex,"act.
The New York Times,
Kurdistan Regional Government
Council of Ministers
Ministry of Humanitarian Aïd & Cooperation
Erbil, Iraqi Kurdir.tan
Statement
Latest Developments on Iraq Kurdistan Asylum Seekers
repatriate without meaningful assistance would put them in a situation whereby
In light of recent developments in Holland and Sweden concerning the situation they do not have the means to successfully re-establish themselves in their own
of Iraqi Kurdistan asylum seekers, 'the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG)
would like to make the following statement.
country.
With regard to presence of Iraqi Kurdistan asylum seekers living in various
European and other cO].Ultries,the KRG has continued to encourage the authorities
of those countries to deal with them in a helpful and humane manner that takes
into consideration the special circumstances of this region. Some countries are
instituting policies to encourage the repatriation of Iraqi Kurdistan asylum
seekers. The KRG has maintained, from the start, the position that it Will not be a
party to any arrangements whereby such asylum seekers are forcibly repatriated.
This position has been constant in communication from the KRG with the
various delegations that have visited Iraqi Kuridstan as well as during missions
and visits by officials from the region that have traveled abroad.
The KRG has often raised the question, with delegations that have come here and
in our meetings abroad, about the manner in which Iraqi Kurdistan asylum
.seekers will be considered for repatriation. With regard to this issue, we wonder
how asylum seekers who have had their cases rejected, and who are therefore
barred from employment, education and any assistance including housing, can in
reality make a free choice to voluntarily return to their country of origin. When
asylum seekers leave their countries and are admitted to another certain
obligations ensue. Iraqi Kurdistan asylum seekers have had to dispose of all their
personal assets. in order to make the journey, To ask them to voluntarily
A delegation from Sweden visited the region recently with the purpose of
communicating us the changes in policy and procedures of the Swedish
government related to Iraqi Kurdistan asylum seekers and the arrangements for
repatriation that are to be implemented in February 2002. Their mission was
simply to convey those changes that had already been made and not to hold
discussions with the KRG. Nonetheless, the KRG has taken this and other
opportunities to clarify its own position on the matter.
The democratic experiment launched by the people of Iraqi Kurdistan some ten
years agocontinues to, be under threat from outside borders. The current
arrangements for the protection of our population are a:cIœowledged and
appreciated but it falls short of that guaranteed security with which people could
feel at ease to go about their daily lives without fear about their future and that of
their. children. We appeal to the various governments who are housing Iraqi
Kurdistan asylum seekers to view Iraqi Kuridstan within its full regional context
and not in isolation for it is in only this full context that their situation can be
understood. We ask that they be considered thoughtfully and carefully.
Finally, the KRG believes that if international guarantees for permanent and
peacful political and economic security of Iraqi Kurdistan were put in place, then
far fewer people from the region would feel the need to leave their country.
2