07.02.2015 Views

BULETIN ğTIIN IFIC - Universitatea George Bacovia

BULETIN ğTIIN IFIC - Universitatea George Bacovia

BULETIN ğTIIN IFIC - Universitatea George Bacovia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Shaping the practical role of a transdisciplinary higher education 31<br />

<br />

<br />

In order to better explain their new approach to the triadic transaction among<br />

education, education policy and business, the authors start from a new vision/paradigm of<br />

human existence based on two fundamental features of reality. On the one hand, there is<br />

the continuous existence of reality (thinking and acting included) and on the other hand,<br />

there is the permanent and simultaneous flow of information, communication, interaction/<br />

transaction between/ among all possible concrete (images of) levels of reality shaped by<br />

(the cultural framework of) every individual. These two fundamental features should not be<br />

confused. Even if, at first sight, they seem to be very similar, we underline the fact that the<br />

former one (the continuous dimension of human existence) is derived from a spatial<br />

dimension, whereas the latter one (the permanent flow of interactions among levels of<br />

reality) is derived from the temporal dimension of human existence.<br />

The interaction between the continuous space and the permanent and simultaneous<br />

flow of transactions generates the transdisciplinary approach which happens in space and<br />

time as a reality with a higher degree of complexity. When the modern thinking began to<br />

study reality, it divided it into discrete forms called sciences/ disciplines/ specializations<br />

with the negative result of lack of communication among all these scientific disciplines. As<br />

a consequence, human mind (which functions as continuous processes, not discrete ones)<br />

refused to accept this segmentation. This refusal created a new way of thinking, the socalled<br />

postmodern or transmodern thinking forms 1 of existence: for example, trandisciplinarity,<br />

transdevelopment and transnational political realities. In education (i.e. the<br />

process of communicating different ways of understanding the reality and of transforming it<br />

according to different criteria) this transition from a paradigm to another took different<br />

forms, such as: learning by doing, learning by acting, action learning, learning by sharing,<br />

experiential learning 2 etc.<br />

The general concept of teaching is changed into a more general one of learning and<br />

thus, the focus being transferred from the teacher to the student. This was a very<br />

important stage in the development of education that prepared another one, namely the<br />

transfer from student focused education to graduate focused education. This means a real<br />

continuum of pedagogical skills which are simultaneously focused on the student and on<br />

the graduate; which is, after all, a real challenge for (higher) education nowadays. The<br />

authors of this paper do believe that the higher education process needs a radical<br />

transformation determined by the new and future levels of reality.<br />

This challenge is very well-served by the transdisciplinary approach 3 , and a quite<br />

concrete application of this is EMMY 4 . At the moment, the authors apply this scientific tool<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

1 After some decades of debating on the usefulness or unusefulness of postmodern thinking, in the last years<br />

the positive and generally accepted contributions of postmodern thinking have been gathered under the<br />

name of transmodern thinking.<br />

2 Each of these forms of learning/ teaching has its advantages and disadvantages, but the most important<br />

thing is to fit one or another to the concrete objectives of the society where they are applied to. As a matter of<br />

fact, this matching could be a result of applying EMMY (ends matched to means).<br />

3 The theory on trandisciplinarity, developed by Basarab Nicolescu, “concerns that which is at once between<br />

the disciplines, across the different disciplines, and beyond all discipline” and characterized by three<br />

features: the logic of the included third; levels of reality; complexity. For more information on<br />

transdisciplinarity, the following book and paper are fundamental: Basarab, Nicolescu, A Manifesto of<br />

Transdisciplinarity, State University of New York, New York, SUNY Press, 2002; The Transdisciplinary<br />

Evolution of the University. Condition for Sustainable Development and Basarab Nicolescu, The<br />

transdisciplinary evolution of learning, http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog /lwf/dl/nicolescu_f.pdf<br />

4 EMMY is a transdiciplinary approach on human being, human existence and human thinking, based on<br />

three former disciplines: politics, economics, ethics. In EMMY’s terminology, all this is, as a matter a fact, a<br />

continuum of ends, means and their permanent matching. Of course, psychology, sociology, anthropology,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!