07.02.2015 Views

BULETIN ğTIIN IFIC - Universitatea George Bacovia

BULETIN ğTIIN IFIC - Universitatea George Bacovia

BULETIN ğTIIN IFIC - Universitatea George Bacovia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Advantages and disadvantages of face-to-face business communication 65<br />

3.2. The tactics used in the distributive negotiation are called by Ch. Dupont<br />

“pressure, coercive, destabilizing, conflict tactics” 5<br />

3.2.1. Threat with the following variations<br />

a) The warning<br />

e.g. “Your attitude will have serious consequences.”<br />

b) De-counselling<br />

e.g. “We do not advise you to make this decision because it will not be in your advantage.”<br />

c) The direct threat<br />

e.g. “We shall act in such a way that your reputation be ruined.”<br />

d) The injunction/opposition<br />

e.g. “You shall act as we say, otherwise you may regret.”<br />

e) Showing the accomplished fact<br />

e.g. “We have already announced our clients that the delivery date is 2 nd of March”<br />

f) The negative appeal to norms<br />

e.g. “What you ask is against our usage.”<br />

g) “Everything or nothing”<br />

e.g. “In this case our price is not negotiable.”<br />

h) The use of surprise (by introducing new facts)<br />

e.g. “You know that now the ROL – dollar rate is …”<br />

i) The change of the decisional plan<br />

e.g. “We gave to inform you that we gave up the items concerning the delivery.”<br />

j) The sudden change of position<br />

e.g. “In this case we shall give up to grant you a price reduction.”<br />

k) Asymmetrical concessions<br />

e.g. “We could grant you a discount, if you placed a larger order.”<br />

l) The avoidance<br />

e.g. “We regret, but we cannot decide on this particular matter.”<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

3.2.2. Time-based tactics<br />

a) The temporising<br />

b) “Speeding up”<br />

c) Finding a good reason for interrupting the negotiation<br />

e.g. “As a am to go abroad, we shall discuss the details on my coming back.”<br />

d) The pretext<br />

e.g. “We have to wait for our general manager’s coming from abroud, as I cannot take this<br />

decision on my own.”<br />

e) The withdrawal<br />

e.g. “We are not able to participate in the negotiations tomorrow, as a special situation<br />

occurred.”<br />

f) The diversion<br />

e.g. “If you don’t mind, I’d like to come back to the clause referring to the terms of delivery<br />

we discussed yesterday.”<br />

5 Dupont, Ch. (1990): La négotiation, conduite, théorie, applications, Dallez, pp. 83-84.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!