26.07.2013 Views

BYTRÆER Diversitet og Forvaltning af By - Tree Advisor

BYTRÆER Diversitet og Forvaltning af By - Tree Advisor

BYTRÆER Diversitet og Forvaltning af By - Tree Advisor

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RESUMÉ<br />

<strong>Diversitet</strong>en <strong>og</strong> forvaltningen <strong>af</strong> by- <strong>og</strong> vejtræer i 30 større danske kommuner er undersøgt for første gang.<br />

Undersøgelsen blev gennemført som kvalitative interviews med træ- <strong>og</strong> parkforvaltere i kommunerne. Der<br />

blev fundet mange ligheder, men <strong>og</strong>så en del forskelle, som kunne forklares med kommunernes forskellige<br />

størrelse med hensyn til indbyggertal, ge<strong>og</strong>r<strong>af</strong>iske udstrækning <strong>og</strong> urbaniseringsgrad. Der var en klar sammenhæng<br />

mellem urbaniseringsgrad <strong>og</strong> tætheden <strong>af</strong> vejtræer i kommunerne. Der var store forskelle på, hvor<br />

systematisk <strong>og</strong> strategisk kommunerne arbejder med forvaltningen <strong>af</strong> deres bytræer. 59% <strong>af</strong> kommunerne<br />

havde en træregistrering, men det var kun knap halvdelen <strong>af</strong> træregistreringerne der var ajourført <strong>og</strong> blev<br />

anvendt i den daglige forvaltning <strong>af</strong> træerne. Den hyppigste anvendelse var systematisering <strong>af</strong> driften. Ganske<br />

få udnytter muligheden for at bruge træregistreringen i det langsigtede strategiske arbejde med udviklingen<br />

<strong>af</strong> træbestanden <strong>og</strong> kun 17% havde en træstrategi. Ingen brugte træregistreringen til værdisætning <strong>af</strong><br />

træbestanden eller til beregning <strong>af</strong> træernes økonomiske bidrag til bl.a. miljøet.<br />

På baggrund <strong>af</strong> data fra kommunernes træregistreringer blev der gennemført analyser <strong>af</strong> diversiteten på<br />

slægtsniveau, artsniveau <strong>og</strong> fordelingen <strong>af</strong> hjemmehørende <strong>og</strong> indførte arter. Flere kommuner er ikke færdige<br />

med at registrere deres træer, så analyserne baserede sig kun på træer der var registreret som minimum til<br />

slægtsniveau. Der var 82.072 vejtræer med i undersøgelsen. 11 slægter udgjorde 92% <strong>af</strong> den samlede vejtræbestand<br />

<strong>og</strong> 2-6 slægter udgjorde mellem 40-80% <strong>af</strong> vejtræbestanden i de enkelte kommuner. Den største<br />

slægt var Tilia (26%).12 arter udgjorde 73% <strong>af</strong> den samlede vejtræbestand. De 6 mest forekommende arter<br />

udgjorde knap 50% <strong>af</strong> vejtræbestanden. De største arter var Tilia europaea (12%), Acer platanoides (10,9%),<br />

Platanus × acerifolia (7,2%), Tilia cordata (7,2%), Fraxinus excelsior (6,2%) <strong>og</strong> Sorbus intermedia (5,9%).<br />

Fire <strong>af</strong> de mest urbaniserede kommuner havde en overvægt <strong>af</strong> indførte arter, men alle kommuner undtagen<br />

én havde flest vejtræer tilhørende hjemmehørende arter.<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The diversity and management of urban and roadside trees in 30 larger Danish municipalities was studied for<br />

the first time. The study was carried out as qualitative interviews with <strong>Tree</strong> and Park Managers in the municipalities.<br />

Many similarities were found, but also more differences that could be explained by their different<br />

size with respect to number of citizens, ge<strong>og</strong>raphic extent and urbanization level. There was a clear relation<br />

between level of urbanization and density of roadside trees in the municipalities. Large differences were<br />

found in the systematic and strategic approach of the municipalities towards their management of urban<br />

trees. 59% of the municipalities had a tree inventory, but only about half of these were updated and used in<br />

the daily management of the trees. The most common use was for systematization of daily operations with<br />

the trees. Only few exploit the opportunity to use the tree inventory for the long term strategic development<br />

work of the tree stock, and only 17% had a tree strategy. No municipalities used the tree inventory for value<br />

assessment of the trees, nor for their economic contribution to e.g. the environment.<br />

Based on data from the tree inventories of the municipalities analysis of the diversity of the tree stock at genus<br />

level and species level was done, as well as examination of the presence of native versus non-native tree<br />

species. More municipalities have not finished registering their urban tree stock, so the analysis only comprises<br />

trees registered as minimum to genus level. A total of 82.072 roadside trees are part of the study. 11<br />

different genera account for 92% of the total roadside tree stock, and 2-6 genera account for 40-80% of the<br />

roadside tree stock in the individual municipalities. Tilia was the most dominating genera (26%). 12 species<br />

account for 73% of the total roadside tree stock. The 6 most common species account for almost 50% of the<br />

total tree stock. The largest species were Tilia europaea (12%), Acer platanoides (10,9%), Platanus ×<br />

acerifolia (7,2%), Tilia cordata (7,2%), Fraxinus excelsior (6,2%) and Sorbus intermedia (5,9%). The four<br />

most urbanized municipalities had a surplus of non-native species, but all municipalities apart from one had<br />

most roadside trees belonging to native species.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!