21.02.2013 Views

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The bricks, carefully laid and accurately jo<strong>in</strong>ted, are of near uniform size<br />

and of dark brown clay. A dist<strong>in</strong>ctive bright red-clay mortar was used. Many<br />

bricks have impressed f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts on their lower side.<br />

Prehistoric Carv<strong>in</strong>gs (3000 B.C.)<br />

Recently I discovered details on two archaeological items that proved to my<br />

entire satisfaction that early humans were cognizant of patterns on their<br />

f<strong>in</strong>gertips. However, before discuss<strong>in</strong>g them, I wish to report on the work of<br />

“a dist<strong>in</strong>guished f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t authority,” a certa<strong>in</strong> Mr. Stockis, who published<br />

a treatise <strong>in</strong> the early 1920s <strong>in</strong> which he attempted to justify his claims that<br />

persons who carved patterns on stand<strong>in</strong>g stones <strong>in</strong> dolmen on Goat Island,<br />

Brittany, France, were aware of ridge detail on their digits. The carv<strong>in</strong>gs he<br />

illustrated depicted symbolic arches, tents, loops, and whorls.<br />

The so-called Stockis theory was <strong>in</strong>vestigated by the em<strong>in</strong>ent f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

expert Professor Harold Cumm<strong>in</strong>s, from the U.S., who reported<br />

If it be true that Neolithic men really noted f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t patterns, and with<br />

the attention to m<strong>in</strong>ute detail which is claimed, credit is due to them for a<br />

spontaneous <strong>in</strong>terest and keenness <strong>in</strong> such observation hardly matched by<br />

the average man of the present day.<br />

In his critique of the Stockis theory, Professor Cumm<strong>in</strong>s acknowledges that<br />

pottery mak<strong>in</strong>g could have revealed ridge detail to Neolithic humans and<br />

accepts that the carv<strong>in</strong>gs are “highly suggestive” of f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts; he even<br />

concedes that this could have been associated with hand worship. However,<br />

he concludes that although ridge detail can be noted <strong>in</strong> the carv<strong>in</strong>gs, there<br />

are other features <strong>in</strong>cluded that def<strong>in</strong>itely do not refer to dermatoglyphics.<br />

He concluded that “sound evidence that the carved designs had their orig<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts appears to be want<strong>in</strong>g.”<br />

The first of my discoveries concerns a national monument at New<br />

Grange, Republic of Ireland (Eire), that I wrote about <strong>in</strong> the 1984 edition of<br />

Ridge Detail <strong>in</strong> Nature:<br />

The national monument at New Grange dates from around 3,000 B.C. and<br />

features a huge man-made mound with a narrow passage lead<strong>in</strong>g to an<br />

<strong>in</strong>ner burial chamber. An open<strong>in</strong>g is located above the entrance so that for<br />

just a few moments at dawn on 21st December each year the rays of the<br />

ris<strong>in</strong>g sun penetrate along the passage to illum<strong>in</strong>ate the burial chamber. A<br />

postage stamp issued on 4th May 1983 depicts patterns at the monument<br />

<strong>in</strong>cised <strong>in</strong> stone. I note that the four basic f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t patterns are shown,<br />

together with numerous deltas. Is it mere co<strong>in</strong>cidence that these patterns

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!