21.02.2013 Views

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and this leads to stability; but for particles formed near the residue, particle<br />

attachment is preferred. The attachment or b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g process is not immediate<br />

and probably requires that the silver particle not grow significantly dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the process (more on this below). The attachment process neutralizes the<br />

particles and makes them catalytic nucleation sites for silver physical development.<br />

Another way of deposit<strong>in</strong>g negatively charged silver particles on the<br />

positively charged residue is by the “surfactant stripp<strong>in</strong>g” process suggested<br />

by Morris. This <strong>in</strong>volves already-formed silver micelles <strong>in</strong> the vic<strong>in</strong>ity of the<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t residue and the process is probably slower because both the micelle and<br />

the residue are positively charged.<br />

Formation of Silver Physical Developer Particles<br />

on Latent Pr<strong>in</strong>t Residue: Silver Image Formation<br />

Once the pr<strong>in</strong>t residue acquires the catalytic nucleation sites, silver physical<br />

development occurs on these sites. The f<strong>in</strong>al particles that grow on these sites<br />

are spherical, about 5 to 40 µm <strong>in</strong> diameter, and are made up of strands of<br />

silver (see Figure 7.2). The gray to black color of these particles is attributed<br />

to their size and configuration. The pr<strong>in</strong>t image is made up of a dense<br />

accumulation of these particles.<br />

Substrates<br />

Porous vs. Nonporous Surfaces<br />

Silver physical developers visualize latent pr<strong>in</strong>ts better if they are on porous<br />

or semiporous surfaces rather than on nonporous surfaces. On porous surfaces,<br />

latent pr<strong>in</strong>t residue enters <strong>in</strong>to and spreads throughout the porous<br />

structure. It thus has a greater surface area and is more exposed than on a<br />

nonporous surface. Because of this, more nucleat<strong>in</strong>g sites are formed on such<br />

residue and silver physical development (silver particle deposition and<br />

growth) occurs sooner and to a greater extent. Another reason why Ag-PDs,<br />

whether (cationic) surfactant stabilized or not, do not visualize latent pr<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

on nonporous surfaces well is because newly formed, negatively charged silver<br />

particles grow. With a cationic surfactant, they also grow but after a certa<strong>in</strong><br />

po<strong>in</strong>t their growth is reduced and their charge is reversed. That is, these<br />

developers cannot reta<strong>in</strong> particles of a fixed size and concentration long<br />

enough for a sufficient number of them to adhere to the latent pr<strong>in</strong>t residue.<br />

Although the use of colloidal gold to create nucleation sites for subsequent<br />

silver physical development is discussed later, it is sufficient to say that treatment<br />

with negatively charged, fixed-size colloidal gold particles (at sufficiently<br />

low pH to create a positive residue) does br<strong>in</strong>g about sufficient particle

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!