21.02.2013 Views

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7. Results of comparisons conducted<br />

8. The number of latent pr<strong>in</strong>ts identified with a specific <strong>in</strong>dividual and<br />

on what specimens the latent pr<strong>in</strong>ts appear<br />

9. The particular f<strong>in</strong>gers identified<br />

10. Complete names, known arrest numbers, social security numbers, and<br />

dates of birth of all persons whose pr<strong>in</strong>ts were compared<br />

11. Identity of exam<strong>in</strong>er who noted (coexam<strong>in</strong>ed) the evidence and verified<br />

the identifications<br />

12. Time and date the exam<strong>in</strong>ation was completed<br />

13. Method used to mark each piece of evidence (so expert can readily<br />

identify each item <strong>in</strong> court)<br />

14. F<strong>in</strong>al disposition of the evidence (In most jurisdictions, evidence must<br />

be returned to the contribut<strong>in</strong>g agency by registered mail. Registry<br />

number should be reta<strong>in</strong>ed. Disposition of <strong>in</strong>tradepartmental evidence<br />

can be documented us<strong>in</strong>g a special form.)<br />

15. Name of contributor of evidence<br />

16. Expert’s reference numbers and contributor’s reference number if<br />

received from another agency<br />

17. Request for special handl<strong>in</strong>g or answer<br />

18. Registry or certified mail number under which evidence was received<br />

19. Full name, rank, and title of person mak<strong>in</strong>g delivery (if evidence is<br />

hand-delivered)<br />

If dur<strong>in</strong>g testimony it becomes difficult to remember the facts, the expert<br />

should refer to the worksheet. It is important to obta<strong>in</strong> authorization from<br />

the judge before do<strong>in</strong>g this. It should be po<strong>in</strong>ted out, however, that cont<strong>in</strong>ual<br />

reference to the worksheet can create the impression that the expert is <strong>in</strong>adequately<br />

prepared. Under the Jenks Act (Title 18, U.S. Code), the defense<br />

attorney may request to see and then cross-exam<strong>in</strong>e the expert from any<br />

worksheet referred to dur<strong>in</strong>g testimony. It is wise to have a photocopy of the<br />

worksheet for consultation if the defense attorney conducts a cross-exam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

from the orig<strong>in</strong>al worksheet. If handwritten, all notes should be legible.<br />

Appearance and Cloth<strong>in</strong>g of Witness<br />

A f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t expert is a salesperson sell<strong>in</strong>g the identification to the jury. The<br />

appearance and cloth<strong>in</strong>g of the expert are therefore important factors <strong>in</strong> this<br />

sell<strong>in</strong>g process. The expert’s appearance and cloth<strong>in</strong>g create the jury’s <strong>in</strong>itial<br />

impression of the expert. The jury judges the witness from these outward<br />

signs given to them. Physical appearance, dress, and manner of testify<strong>in</strong>g all<br />

affect the jury as they beg<strong>in</strong> to determ<strong>in</strong>e the credibility and weight to be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!