21.02.2013 Views

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Source of the Latent Pr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

The source of the latent pr<strong>in</strong>t is also very critical. If the defense attorney can<br />

illustrate to the jury that the defendant could have had legitimate access to<br />

the object or area where the latent pr<strong>in</strong>t was developed, he/she can effectively<br />

dilute the weight of the latent pr<strong>in</strong>t testimony. An example is if the latent<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t was developed on an entrance door to the bank that had been robbed.<br />

Obviously, anyone could legitimately touch an entrance door. If the latent<br />

pr<strong>in</strong>t is from the vault door of the bank, however, and the defendant is not<br />

an employee of that bank, there is no legitimate reason for his latent pr<strong>in</strong>t(s)<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g present on the vault door.<br />

Transcripts of Prior Testimony<br />

The expert should review transcripts of any previous testimony given <strong>in</strong> the<br />

case <strong>in</strong> which the expert is about to testify. If testify<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> state or federal<br />

court, testimony will be recorded. Defense attorneys will often exam<strong>in</strong>e previous<br />

transcripts of expert testimony for any <strong>in</strong>consistencies <strong>in</strong> the same area of testimony.<br />

An example is <strong>in</strong> stated qualifications. If any <strong>in</strong>consistencies are noted,<br />

they can be used aga<strong>in</strong>st the expert. If the expert does not satisfactorily expla<strong>in</strong><br />

these <strong>in</strong>consistencies, the jury may give less credit to the expert’s testimony.<br />

Use of Books and Articles <strong>in</strong> Cross-exam<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

A defense attorney may attempt to cross-exam<strong>in</strong>e the expert from a book or<br />

article. The defense attorney must <strong>in</strong>itially establish the book or article as be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

authoritative; this can be accomplished <strong>in</strong> any one of three follow<strong>in</strong>g ways:<br />

1. The easiest method is to have the expert admit that the book or article<br />

is authoritative.<br />

2. The judge may take judicial notice that the book or article is authoritative.<br />

3. Another expert may testify that the book or article is authoritative.<br />

(Of course, the defense attorney would not attempt to <strong>in</strong>troduce the<br />

article or book unless it conta<strong>in</strong>ed statements contrary to the expert’s<br />

testimony.)<br />

When the defense attorney reads a quote from a book, the expert should<br />

always ask to see the book unless personally familiar with the book. The<br />

expert should then read the quote. This is absolutely necessary for the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

reasons:<br />

1. The quote may have been taken out of context.<br />

2. The quote may have been <strong>in</strong>complete.<br />

3. The publication may be outdated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!