21.02.2013 Views

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

extreme variability of friction ridge patterns, ridge characteristics, <strong>in</strong>tr<strong>in</strong>sic<br />

ridge shapes, and pore locations. Traditionally, f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong>dividuality has<br />

been discussed with reference to the ridge characteristics, or f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utiae. These characteristics are now classified as a portion of Second Level<br />

Detail, which encompasses the paths and the ridges (along with any scars,<br />

<strong>in</strong>cipient ridges, or flexion creases). 6 The relative position, orientation, and<br />

type of f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t m<strong>in</strong>utiae with<strong>in</strong> the ridge pattern are extremely variable,<br />

even among identical tw<strong>in</strong>s. This is known to be because, <strong>in</strong> addition to<br />

overall genetic <strong>in</strong>fluences, 7 the positions of m<strong>in</strong>utiae with<strong>in</strong> the friction ridge<br />

pattern are determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the highly variable dynamics of fetal hand development.<br />

The extreme variability <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>utiae among f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts is readily<br />

appreciated if one takes pr<strong>in</strong>ts from different <strong>in</strong>dividuals and an attempt is<br />

made to successively f<strong>in</strong>d a correspondence <strong>in</strong> a group of three, then four,<br />

then five m<strong>in</strong>utiae. A correspondence <strong>in</strong> four m<strong>in</strong>utiae might well be found<br />

upon diligent, extended effort when compar<strong>in</strong>g the full set of pr<strong>in</strong>ts of one<br />

<strong>in</strong>dividual with those of another person. (In do<strong>in</strong>g this, one might well ignore<br />

other, f<strong>in</strong>er detail that dist<strong>in</strong>guishes the two pr<strong>in</strong>ts, but then aga<strong>in</strong>, such detail<br />

might well be absent <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ts of less clarity.) For a legitimate correspondence<br />

of five po<strong>in</strong>ts between different <strong>in</strong>dividuals, it might mean search<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

weeks among many different <strong>in</strong>dividuals. A correspondence of six po<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

might be a lifetime’s search. Unfortunately, although there is extensive collective<br />

experience among casework exam<strong>in</strong>ers, 8 there has been no systematic<br />

study such as that described above.<br />

Nonetheless, the f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t exam<strong>in</strong>er’s op<strong>in</strong>ion of absolute identification<br />

is a logical extension of this process, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g as its f<strong>in</strong>al step a “leap<br />

of faith” where, <strong>in</strong> the critical, experienced (but subjective) judgment of the<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>er, it is <strong>in</strong>conceivable that the f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t could have come from<br />

another person’s f<strong>in</strong>ger.<br />

Important factors that enter <strong>in</strong>to the professional judgment of an absolute<br />

identification are<br />

1. The extent of the pr<strong>in</strong>ts (area and number of ridge characteristics)<br />

2. The clarity of the pr<strong>in</strong>ts<br />

3. The presence or absence of dissimilarities<br />

4. The exam<strong>in</strong>er’s tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, experience, skill, and ethics<br />

Limitations of Traditional Po<strong>in</strong>ts of Comparison<br />

The number of correspond<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>utiae, or “po<strong>in</strong>ts,” is a convenient, somewhat<br />

objective feature to use when discuss<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t comparisons.<br />

Because of their nearly universal use when describ<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t comparisons,<br />

and because of the historical acceptance of 12 “po<strong>in</strong>ts” as a conclusive

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!