21.02.2013 Views

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

Advances in Fingerprint Technology.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

This chapter exam<strong>in</strong>es the underly<strong>in</strong>g statistical basis for f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t comparisons<br />

and reviews the efforts that have been made to measure friction<br />

ridge variability as it relates to forensic comparison and identification of<br />

f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

This chapter does not consider the foundational <strong>in</strong>formation that supports<br />

the practice of f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t identification. That is, the chapter does not<br />

review the embryology, comparative anatomy, and genetics of friction ridge<br />

sk<strong>in</strong>. These well-developed areas of study do contribute essential <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

that establishes the feasibility and utility of f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t identifications, but<br />

they do not provide criteria for conclud<strong>in</strong>g that two f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts were made<br />

by the same f<strong>in</strong>ger. Neither does the long-stand<strong>in</strong>g practice and effectiveness<br />

of f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t evidence provide such criteria.<br />

This chapter is specifically concerned with the question: How much<br />

correspondence between two f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts is sufficient to conclude that they<br />

were both made by the same f<strong>in</strong>ger? The amount of correspondence has two<br />

dimensions: quantity and quality. Quantity itself <strong>in</strong>cludes two aspects. The<br />

first is how much of the sk<strong>in</strong> surface is represented <strong>in</strong> the comparison; and<br />

the second is how many (and what k<strong>in</strong>d of) details make up the correspondence.<br />

The dimension of quality <strong>in</strong> a f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t correspondence is determ<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

by how clearly and accurately the sk<strong>in</strong> surface is represented <strong>in</strong> the<br />

two pr<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

An adequate answer to the question posed <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g paragraph<br />

is not currently available. The best answer at present to the question, “How<br />

much is enough?” is that this is up to the <strong>in</strong>dividual expert f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>er to determ<strong>in</strong>e, based on that exam<strong>in</strong>er’s tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, skill, and experience.<br />

1 Thus, we have an ill-def<strong>in</strong>ed, flexible, and explicitly subjective criterion<br />

for establish<strong>in</strong>g a f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t identification. The need for a standard, objective<br />

criterion has itself been controversial because subjective methods have been<br />

so universally effective and accepted for so long. Even admitt<strong>in</strong>g the need,<br />

there is considerable difficulty <strong>in</strong> def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>gful measurements for<br />

quality and quantity <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t comparisons. This difficulty will become<br />

apparent <strong>in</strong> this review of the efforts that have been made.<br />

The chapter beg<strong>in</strong>s by look<strong>in</strong>g at the foundational aspects and standards<br />

that are <strong>in</strong> place regard<strong>in</strong>g the mak<strong>in</strong>g of a f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t identification; that is, the<br />

criteria for establish<strong>in</strong>g that two f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>ts were made by the same f<strong>in</strong>ger.<br />

Standards <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t Identification<br />

Any unbiased, <strong>in</strong>telligent assessment of f<strong>in</strong>gerpr<strong>in</strong>t identification practices<br />

today reveals that there are, <strong>in</strong> reality, no standards. That is, the amount of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!