23.02.2013 Views

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NUMBER 30 119<br />

the period has often clarified certain statements<br />

that at first glance are bewildering.<br />

The Wichita in the 1500s<br />

The Wichita were first described by members<br />

of two Spanish expeditions seeking gold and silver,<br />

which went from New Mexico to an area<br />

called Quivira. One was led by Francisco Vasques<br />

de Coronado in 1541; the other by Juan de Onate<br />

in 1601. Although these two journeys were separated<br />

by 60 years, the resulting descriptions of the<br />

Quivirans and of the routes followed to reach<br />

them are similar enough to justify the conclusion<br />

that in both cases the same region and people are<br />

indicated.<br />

It has been proposed and generally accepted<br />

that the Quivirans were Wichita-speaking Caddoans.<br />

They were extensively tattooed as the<br />

Wichita are known to have been in later historic<br />

times; they lived in tall grass houses typical of<br />

those built by later Wichita; and two of their<br />

settlements and/or subdivisions had names that<br />

identify with 18th-century Wichita band names.<br />

Hereafter, I shall use the term "Wichita" to mean<br />

the Wichita-speaking Caddo and "Wichita<br />

proper" for the band to which that name was<br />

originally restricted.<br />

The following descriptive information pertaining<br />

to the 1500s is derived from documents based<br />

on firsthand observations made by the two expedition<br />

leaders, by two men who accompanied<br />

Coronado to Quivira (Smith, 1857:147-163), and<br />

in addition by those who testified both in the<br />

1544 hearing conducted to determine what cruelties<br />

Coronado perpetrated upon <strong>Indian</strong>s during<br />

his 1540-1542 journey northward (Informacion,<br />

1544), and in the 1602 official inquiry conducted<br />

by Don Francisco de Valverde into the accomplishments<br />

of Ofiate the year before (Hammond<br />

and Rey, 1953, 2:836-877). Twenty or more years<br />

after the Coronado entrada, Pedro de Castaneda<br />

de Najera (1596) composed a relation, which<br />

contained firsthand knowledge of the Coronado<br />

trek onto the <strong>Plains</strong>, but only secondhand data<br />

on the region of Quivira.<br />

In the 1500s the Wichita appear to have been<br />

living northeast and possibly east of the Great<br />

Bend of the Arkansas River, an area which was<br />

bounded on the north by the Smoky Hill River<br />

and is now within the State of Kansas (Figure<br />

14). Herbert E. Bolton's (1949:427-428) on-theground<br />

reconstruction of the Coronado route<br />

based on documentary data, led him to this location<br />

and later was corroborated by archeological<br />

investigations conducted by Waldo R. Wedel.<br />

More specifically, the 1541 party (Smith,<br />

1857:160) found the Wichita living along two<br />

small tributaries of the Arkansas, probably Cow<br />

Creek and the Little Arkansas River (W. Wedel,<br />

1942:12; 1959:585-587). Coronado then led his<br />

slow-moving troops for four or five days to what<br />

was described as the "end of Quivira" (Smith,<br />

1857:160), where there was a larger river than the<br />

previous ones along which settlements had been<br />

seen. This is usually identified as the Smoky Hill.<br />

Identification of Oiiate's specific destination is<br />

less satisfactory, although his presence in the same<br />

region is generally accepted. Bolton (1916:260)<br />

suggested this Spaniard found Quivirans on one<br />

of the same tributaries as did Coronado, while W.<br />

Wedel (1942:18-20) has proposed that a location<br />

farther east near present-day Arkansas City, Kansas,<br />

near the mouth of Walnut River, should also<br />

be given consideration. "Other people," presumably<br />

Wichita, were reported in 1601 (Bolton,<br />

1916:261-262) to be living "due east" down the<br />

Arkansas. To judge by the known geographical<br />

extent of the Great Bend Aspect archeological<br />

materials (those that W. Wedel (1959:571-589)<br />

has proposed include the cultural remains of 16thcentury<br />

Wichita), they were not living east of the<br />

Walnut River basin or south of the modern Kansas-Oklahoma<br />

line.<br />

In both 1541 and 1601 the Spaniards were<br />

impressed by the large population in Quivira (M.<br />

Wedel, 1979:187). There are many hazards involved<br />

in making an estimate of their number<br />

based on written records. With this in mind,<br />

Newcomb and Field (1967:341) conjectured that<br />

the population of all Quivira would fall between<br />

15,000 and 33,000. These people were described

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!