23.02.2013 Views

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY<br />

mentation does not permit one to obtain a particularized<br />

and coherent view of how the 16thcentury<br />

Caddoan-flavored, but bison dependent,<br />

lifeway of the Wichita became more oriented in<br />

the following centuries toward that of the <strong>Plains</strong><br />

<strong>Indian</strong>s.<br />

Therefore, let us examine with greater care<br />

some of the changes stimulated by Europeans,<br />

that were recorded. In the 1500s the Wichita<br />

though aggressive appear to have been living in<br />

comparative peace well beyond European influence.<br />

The raiding-type hostilities in which they<br />

and their enemies engaged (Newcomb, 1976:11)<br />

did not prevent certain bands from maintaining<br />

residency just south of Smoky Hill River. The<br />

situation evidently altered in the next century<br />

when <strong>Indian</strong>s living some distance to the north<br />

and northeast inveigled Frenchmen with firearms,<br />

who had taken up residence among them,<br />

to join in assaults on their gunless foes, assaults<br />

that were probably aimed at procuring horses<br />

and slaves. There is documentation (M. Wedel,<br />

1981:34) for destructive attacks on the Wichita<br />

for a few years at the end of the 17th century.<br />

The chief culprits may have been those called<br />

enemies in 1719—the Missouri <strong>Indian</strong>s and certain<br />

Pawnee. In 1693, the French formed a trading<br />

alliance (Thwaites, 1896-1901, 64:161, 169)<br />

with the Missouri, their friends of a decade, who<br />

were living in what is now central Missouri on<br />

the river of that name. This may have led to a<br />

series of cooperative war expeditions like those<br />

reportedly made to the Wichita the following<br />

year. In 1700 when Frenchmen were living and<br />

intermarrying with Pawnee (C. Delisle, [1702])<br />

on the Platte River, Apache <strong>Indian</strong>s told Spaniards<br />

(M. Wedel, 1981:34) that an entire Wichita<br />

village had been "destroyed" by Frenchmen,<br />

meaning probably an <strong>Indian</strong>-French party. Some<br />

of the horses the Pawnee already possessed (M.<br />

Wedel, 1973:205) may have been stolen earlier<br />

from the Wichita. This joint warfare appears to<br />

have eased when French traders, having become<br />

aware of these <strong>Plains</strong> Caddoans, began to view<br />

them as prospective trade associates. By this time,<br />

however, the bands that had lived on Smoky Hill<br />

River up until the 1680s or 1700 had moved to<br />

more southern positions in the Arkansas River<br />

basin. Their longterm penetration northward on<br />

the <strong>Plains</strong> had been checked with the help of<br />

French guns.<br />

The Wichita, having become aware of the<br />

benefits of French trade, may have located their<br />

new villages that were recorded in 1719 with an<br />

eye to acquisition of more European items. Their<br />

thinking on this is neither stated in documents<br />

nor readily apparent. Did those near the Verdigris<br />

expect to benefit from trade directly with the<br />

French or through Osage middlemen? Had the<br />

Tawakoni set up a village on Wealaka Ridge<br />

hoping to place themselves where French traders<br />

or <strong>Indian</strong> entrepreneurs from Red River might<br />

regularly contact them?<br />

The new settlements were no longer composed<br />

of hamlets like those the 16th and early 17th<br />

century Spaniards described. Instead, their inhabitants<br />

had joined together forming large villages,<br />

presumably for greater security from gunbearing<br />

enemies. By the middle of the 18th century,<br />

thus at the end of the 200-year period under<br />

study, it had evidently become necessary to fortify<br />

villages to some extent.<br />

What 18th-century warfare patterns had<br />

brought this about? Hostile <strong>Indian</strong>s to the southwest<br />

never seem to have been a severe threat to<br />

Wichita villages. Some, like the pedestrian Escanjaques,<br />

may have caused temporary flight from<br />

Quiviran hamlets when at times they raided gardens<br />

and the stored food reserves, but they were<br />

not responsible for permanent abandonment in<br />

historic times. In the 16th century they and probably<br />

other <strong>Indian</strong>s on the southern <strong>Plains</strong> showed<br />

their animosity chiefly by capturing Wichita to<br />

trade as slaves to Pueblo <strong>Indian</strong>s.<br />

In the latter half of the 1600s, the Apache<br />

became the leading enemies of the Wichita in<br />

that southwest region, trading the captives they<br />

procured to Spanish colonists now living in New<br />

Mexico rather than to Pueblo <strong>Indian</strong>s. The increased<br />

mobility of the Apache, mounted by this<br />

time on Spanish horses, created more opportunities<br />

for hostile encounters with the Wichita. The<br />

latter, on their part, found raids on the Apache a<br />

good way to increase their precious horse herds.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!