Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
130 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY<br />
mentation does not permit one to obtain a particularized<br />
and coherent view of how the 16thcentury<br />
Caddoan-flavored, but bison dependent,<br />
lifeway of the Wichita became more oriented in<br />
the following centuries toward that of the <strong>Plains</strong><br />
<strong>Indian</strong>s.<br />
Therefore, let us examine with greater care<br />
some of the changes stimulated by Europeans,<br />
that were recorded. In the 1500s the Wichita<br />
though aggressive appear to have been living in<br />
comparative peace well beyond European influence.<br />
The raiding-type hostilities in which they<br />
and their enemies engaged (Newcomb, 1976:11)<br />
did not prevent certain bands from maintaining<br />
residency just south of Smoky Hill River. The<br />
situation evidently altered in the next century<br />
when <strong>Indian</strong>s living some distance to the north<br />
and northeast inveigled Frenchmen with firearms,<br />
who had taken up residence among them,<br />
to join in assaults on their gunless foes, assaults<br />
that were probably aimed at procuring horses<br />
and slaves. There is documentation (M. Wedel,<br />
1981:34) for destructive attacks on the Wichita<br />
for a few years at the end of the 17th century.<br />
The chief culprits may have been those called<br />
enemies in 1719—the Missouri <strong>Indian</strong>s and certain<br />
Pawnee. In 1693, the French formed a trading<br />
alliance (Thwaites, 1896-1901, 64:161, 169)<br />
with the Missouri, their friends of a decade, who<br />
were living in what is now central Missouri on<br />
the river of that name. This may have led to a<br />
series of cooperative war expeditions like those<br />
reportedly made to the Wichita the following<br />
year. In 1700 when Frenchmen were living and<br />
intermarrying with Pawnee (C. Delisle, [1702])<br />
on the Platte River, Apache <strong>Indian</strong>s told Spaniards<br />
(M. Wedel, 1981:34) that an entire Wichita<br />
village had been "destroyed" by Frenchmen,<br />
meaning probably an <strong>Indian</strong>-French party. Some<br />
of the horses the Pawnee already possessed (M.<br />
Wedel, 1973:205) may have been stolen earlier<br />
from the Wichita. This joint warfare appears to<br />
have eased when French traders, having become<br />
aware of these <strong>Plains</strong> Caddoans, began to view<br />
them as prospective trade associates. By this time,<br />
however, the bands that had lived on Smoky Hill<br />
River up until the 1680s or 1700 had moved to<br />
more southern positions in the Arkansas River<br />
basin. Their longterm penetration northward on<br />
the <strong>Plains</strong> had been checked with the help of<br />
French guns.<br />
The Wichita, having become aware of the<br />
benefits of French trade, may have located their<br />
new villages that were recorded in 1719 with an<br />
eye to acquisition of more European items. Their<br />
thinking on this is neither stated in documents<br />
nor readily apparent. Did those near the Verdigris<br />
expect to benefit from trade directly with the<br />
French or through Osage middlemen? Had the<br />
Tawakoni set up a village on Wealaka Ridge<br />
hoping to place themselves where French traders<br />
or <strong>Indian</strong> entrepreneurs from Red River might<br />
regularly contact them?<br />
The new settlements were no longer composed<br />
of hamlets like those the 16th and early 17th<br />
century Spaniards described. Instead, their inhabitants<br />
had joined together forming large villages,<br />
presumably for greater security from gunbearing<br />
enemies. By the middle of the 18th century,<br />
thus at the end of the 200-year period under<br />
study, it had evidently become necessary to fortify<br />
villages to some extent.<br />
What 18th-century warfare patterns had<br />
brought this about? Hostile <strong>Indian</strong>s to the southwest<br />
never seem to have been a severe threat to<br />
Wichita villages. Some, like the pedestrian Escanjaques,<br />
may have caused temporary flight from<br />
Quiviran hamlets when at times they raided gardens<br />
and the stored food reserves, but they were<br />
not responsible for permanent abandonment in<br />
historic times. In the 16th century they and probably<br />
other <strong>Indian</strong>s on the southern <strong>Plains</strong> showed<br />
their animosity chiefly by capturing Wichita to<br />
trade as slaves to Pueblo <strong>Indian</strong>s.<br />
In the latter half of the 1600s, the Apache<br />
became the leading enemies of the Wichita in<br />
that southwest region, trading the captives they<br />
procured to Spanish colonists now living in New<br />
Mexico rather than to Pueblo <strong>Indian</strong>s. The increased<br />
mobility of the Apache, mounted by this<br />
time on Spanish horses, created more opportunities<br />
for hostile encounters with the Wichita. The<br />
latter, on their part, found raids on the Apache a<br />
good way to increase their precious horse herds.