Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
204 SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY<br />
dor to the Northern <strong>Plains</strong> at such an early date.<br />
The Sandia Cave dates, upon which Miiller-Beck<br />
derives his basal age for older Llano, are not<br />
considered reliable (Stevens and Agogino,<br />
1975:22).<br />
The concept that the Aurignacoid industries<br />
gave rise to late Eskimo and Aleut traditions is<br />
supported by recent excavations at Dry Creek,<br />
Alaska (Powers and Hamilton, 1978), Onion Portage,<br />
Alaska (Anderson, 1970) and at Bluefish<br />
Cave, Yukon Territory (Cinq-Mars, 1979). All<br />
support a minimal age of 11,000 years for the<br />
American Paleo-Arctic tradition.<br />
MacNeish divides the human occupation of<br />
the New World into four hypothetical stages<br />
(MacNeish, 1978, 1979a). These stages are divided<br />
on the basis of technological attributes of<br />
artifacts into "undated probable," "possible,"<br />
and "dated probable" complexes, based on<br />
MacNeish's assessment of the reliability of data<br />
from various New World sites.<br />
STAGE I (MacNeish's "Undated Probable").—<br />
The big game collectors dates from around 70,000<br />
to 30,000 years old and is characterized by crude,<br />
large bifacial choppers, cleavers, concave-sided<br />
unifaces, and retouched flakes. Sites included in<br />
this stage and which will be discussed in this<br />
paper are the Ayacucho Pacaicasa, Old Crow,<br />
Santa Rosa Island, Lewisville, Levi Rock Shelter<br />
(stratum IV), Tlapacoya, El Bosque, and Tagua-<br />
Tagua.<br />
STAGE II ("Possible").—Unspecialized hunters,<br />
dates as old as 28,000 years in North America<br />
and lasts up to 10,000 years ago in South America.<br />
It includes such sites and assemblages as the<br />
El Homo locality at Valsequillo, the Ayacucho<br />
complex at Pikimachay Cave and the lowest level<br />
at Meadowcroft Rock Shelter, and Los Toldos<br />
Cave. Characteristic implements include unifacial<br />
projectile points, burin-like tools, large flat<br />
flakes with retouched and denticulated edges, as<br />
well as bone tools.<br />
STAGE III ("Dated Probable").—Specialized<br />
hunters, dates from 20,000 years old in North<br />
America to 11,000 years old in South America. It<br />
is characterized as having bifacial leaf-shaped<br />
projectile points, blades, and burins. Sites included<br />
in this stage are Meadowcroft Rock Shelter,<br />
Wilson Butte Cave, Hueyatlaco locality and<br />
Unit E at Valsequillo, and Taima-Taima.<br />
STAGE IV.—Ecozonal specialized hunters,<br />
dates between 13,000 and 10,000 years ago. Included<br />
in this stage are all of the widely recognized<br />
Paleo-<strong>Indian</strong> complexes of North and<br />
South America.<br />
Although MacNeish (1979a:2) admits that the<br />
evidence for demarcation of these stages is poor,<br />
he feels, that the data are sufficient to cause a<br />
rethinking of concepts about early man in the<br />
Americas.<br />
Alan Bryan (1965, 1977a, 1978, 1979) presents<br />
a model of multilinear evolution in which there<br />
are independent lines of development of Paleo-<br />
<strong>Indian</strong> technologies. He feels these technological<br />
traditions are the result of responses to different<br />
environments found in the Western Hemisphere.<br />
Bryan's major traditions consist of (1) the Fluted<br />
Point, (2) the Stemmed Point, and (3) the<br />
Notched Point traditions. All are thought to have<br />
evolved from a generalized technological pattern<br />
that had its roots in an Old World Paleolithic<br />
core, flake, and bone-working technology. This is<br />
evidenced in such sites as Texas Street and Calico<br />
Hills, both in California.<br />
Thus, there is little disparity among the major<br />
interpretations for New World origins as briefly<br />
outlined above. Major differences that are initially<br />
apparent rest almost entirely with the quality<br />
of data that various investigators will accept<br />
as evidence for a human occupation site. However,<br />
most researchers agree that an early cultural<br />
tradition that developed in Asia moved into the<br />
Americas with a relatively simple lithic and bone<br />
technology.<br />
Criteria for Acceptable Archeological Evidence<br />
The major problems surrounding hypothetical<br />
early man sites are the reliability of the radiometric<br />
dates, the lack of (or inadequately understood)<br />
stratigraphy, and the identification of artifacts<br />
or of pseudo-artifacts.