Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
NUMBER 30 205<br />
Radiometric determinations are extremely<br />
complex, and more research on dating technology<br />
needs to be conducted so that the reliability of<br />
dates can be assessed. This is true for wood charcoal<br />
dates, as well as for the more controversial<br />
bone collagen and apatite dates. There is also a<br />
need for additional research regarding racemization,<br />
paleomagnetism, and thermoluminescence<br />
techniques. Given the difficulties with these dating<br />
techniques, it is clear that a single radiometric<br />
date cannot be considered reliable for dating a<br />
site or an occupation level. Nor can dates that<br />
have been run on bone or other organic matter<br />
be considered accurate until many problems with<br />
these techniques are worked out.<br />
Rudimentary flaking is not indicative of any<br />
chronological or cultural technological stage.<br />
Thus, it is impossible to identify an early cultural<br />
tradition on the basis of lithic technology from<br />
surface-collected artifacts. Only sites that have<br />
precisely dated stratigraphy can be used as evidence<br />
for early man.<br />
The major problem is to distinguish artifacts<br />
from bone and stone objects that have been altered<br />
by various natural noncultural processes.<br />
This problem cannot be resolved until well-conceived<br />
experiments and studies with sound theoretical<br />
and systematic approaches have been conducted.<br />
Impressionistic statements merely cloud<br />
the literature with misleading and confusing information.<br />
A site must meet the following criteria to be<br />
accepted as evidence for a pre-Clovis culture: (1)<br />
clearly defined stratigraphy; (2) reliable and consistent<br />
radiometric dates; (3) consonance of the<br />
data from various relevant interdisciplinary researches;<br />
and (4) unquestionable human artifacts<br />
in indisputable association. These rigid criteria<br />
would eliminate most of the existing sites from<br />
any discussion. Nevertheless, in the following paragraphs<br />
I will discuss some of the dubious sites,<br />
mainly because, they indicate strongly that pre-<br />
12,000-year-old occupations might be found in<br />
the New World and because most of them have<br />
been used by various authors to support the<br />
existence of extremely early occupations. My ob<br />
servations are confined to those sites of which I<br />
have firsthand knowledge or are published in<br />
sufficient detail.<br />
Site Evidence<br />
Recent finds in the Arctic suggest that man<br />
may have been in the New World for a much<br />
greater number of years than previously recognized<br />
(Figure 34). The discovery of a flesher made<br />
of caribou bone from the Old Crow Basin in the<br />
Canadian Yukon resulted in an increased effort<br />
to locate pre-Clovis remains (Irving and Harington,<br />
1973). The caribou flesher, although nearly<br />
identical to those used by the modern Athapaskan<br />
<strong>Indian</strong>s, was dated to an age of 25,000 to 30,000<br />
years old. Research by Bonnichsen and Morlan<br />
(Bonnichsen, 1978, 1979) on the modification of<br />
fossil bone indicates that it would have been<br />
impossible for this tool to have been manufactured<br />
after fossilization.<br />
These discoveries gave impetus for two longrange<br />
research programs to be undertaken in the<br />
Old Crow Basin. The first was organized by<br />
Irving of the University of Toronto and is known<br />
as the Northwest Yukon Refugium Project<br />
(NYRP), while the second, the Yukon Refugium<br />
Project (YRP), was organized by Morlan of the<br />
Canadian National Museum of Man. The research<br />
teams involved with these projects have<br />
spent the last few years diligently searching for<br />
evidence of early man in the Yukon (Irving and<br />
Cing-Mars, 1974; Irving and Harington, 1973,<br />
1978; Morlan 1977, 1978, 1980) and have produced<br />
impressive numbers of fossil remains and<br />
paleoecological dates. Unfortunately, the researchers<br />
have not been able to locate an in situ<br />
occupation level on or within any of the river<br />
terraces that they have examined in the Yukon.<br />
Instead, nearly all fossils have been found in<br />
redeposited contexts along gravel bars of the Porcupine<br />
and Old Crow rivers, as well as in buried<br />
erosional surfaces. Fewer than a dozen bones have<br />
been found in possibly primary depositional context.<br />
Some megafaunal bones were modified into<br />
unquestionable artifacts while others show signs