23.02.2013 Views

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NUMBER 30 165<br />

MNI MNI<br />

FIGURE 25.—The extremes of the possible relationships between<br />

minimum number of individuals (MNI) and total<br />

fragment count (E) (a = relationship when each species is<br />

represented by one bone type; b = relationship when each<br />

species is represented by ten bone types).<br />

creases, the lower limit "b" gets closer to the Xaxis.<br />

In practice, bone element types are not<br />

found in equal proportions, and the position of a<br />

sample within the pie-shaped range is controlled<br />

by what Holtzman (1979:78) has called the<br />

"effective number of elements per individual"<br />

(ENI). For instance, if one of the 10 element types<br />

in the example actually turned up as 25% of the<br />

samples, then the ENI would be 4 and the slope<br />

of the relationship between MNI and E would<br />

have a rise of about 1 in 4 instead of 1 in 10.<br />

Therefore, any deviation from a straight line in<br />

the relationship between MNI and E is due to a<br />

change in the probability of recovering the most<br />

common element type.<br />

Some empirical evidence can be produced to<br />

show that this is the case. If the MNI and E<br />

values for all the bird samples in Parmalee's<br />

report (1977:199, table 3) are plotted, the linear<br />

configuration in Figure 26 results, indicating that<br />

the effective number of individuals for the different<br />

taxonomic groups in the samples does not<br />

vary greatly. For other kinds of fauna the situation<br />

is somewhat different. Computing the ENI<br />

for bison in the three samples published by Gilbert<br />

(1969:283, table 4) yields the following three<br />

FIGURE 26.—Plot of the relationship between MNI and E<br />

for a series of bird-bone samples from the <strong>Plains</strong> (Parmalee,<br />

1977). The relationship is linear because the effective number<br />

of elements per individual (ENI) for all the samples falls<br />

within a very small range.<br />

MN<br />

oo<br />

25 1X100)<br />

FIGURE 27.—Relationship between MNI and E for a series<br />

of caprine samples from three Near Eastern tells (X = points<br />

for the site of Godin Tepe (A. Gilbert, 1979), which produce<br />

the line A; 0 = points for the site of Beidha (Hecker, 1975),<br />

which produce the line B; dots = points for the site of Tepe<br />

Ganj Dareh (Hesse, 1978), which produce the line C; units<br />

of E should be multiplied by 100).<br />

values: Woodland, 6.9; Middle Missouri, 14.5;<br />

Coalescent, 14.2. Adding values calculated from<br />

Calabrese's (1972) study, 37.7 (his table 13), and<br />

48 (his table 15), one can see evidence of what<br />

would appear to be a highly variable relationship<br />

between sites. In Figure 27 the relationship between<br />

MNI and E for the caprine samples for<br />

three Near Eastern tell sites are plotted. Each of<br />

the distributions can be approximated by a<br />

straight line. This suggests that the effective num-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!