Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Plains Indian Studies - Smithsonian Institution Libraries
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NUMBER 30 165<br />
MNI MNI<br />
FIGURE 25.—The extremes of the possible relationships between<br />
minimum number of individuals (MNI) and total<br />
fragment count (E) (a = relationship when each species is<br />
represented by one bone type; b = relationship when each<br />
species is represented by ten bone types).<br />
creases, the lower limit "b" gets closer to the Xaxis.<br />
In practice, bone element types are not<br />
found in equal proportions, and the position of a<br />
sample within the pie-shaped range is controlled<br />
by what Holtzman (1979:78) has called the<br />
"effective number of elements per individual"<br />
(ENI). For instance, if one of the 10 element types<br />
in the example actually turned up as 25% of the<br />
samples, then the ENI would be 4 and the slope<br />
of the relationship between MNI and E would<br />
have a rise of about 1 in 4 instead of 1 in 10.<br />
Therefore, any deviation from a straight line in<br />
the relationship between MNI and E is due to a<br />
change in the probability of recovering the most<br />
common element type.<br />
Some empirical evidence can be produced to<br />
show that this is the case. If the MNI and E<br />
values for all the bird samples in Parmalee's<br />
report (1977:199, table 3) are plotted, the linear<br />
configuration in Figure 26 results, indicating that<br />
the effective number of individuals for the different<br />
taxonomic groups in the samples does not<br />
vary greatly. For other kinds of fauna the situation<br />
is somewhat different. Computing the ENI<br />
for bison in the three samples published by Gilbert<br />
(1969:283, table 4) yields the following three<br />
FIGURE 26.—Plot of the relationship between MNI and E<br />
for a series of bird-bone samples from the <strong>Plains</strong> (Parmalee,<br />
1977). The relationship is linear because the effective number<br />
of elements per individual (ENI) for all the samples falls<br />
within a very small range.<br />
MN<br />
oo<br />
25 1X100)<br />
FIGURE 27.—Relationship between MNI and E for a series<br />
of caprine samples from three Near Eastern tells (X = points<br />
for the site of Godin Tepe (A. Gilbert, 1979), which produce<br />
the line A; 0 = points for the site of Beidha (Hecker, 1975),<br />
which produce the line B; dots = points for the site of Tepe<br />
Ganj Dareh (Hesse, 1978), which produce the line C; units<br />
of E should be multiplied by 100).<br />
values: Woodland, 6.9; Middle Missouri, 14.5;<br />
Coalescent, 14.2. Adding values calculated from<br />
Calabrese's (1972) study, 37.7 (his table 13), and<br />
48 (his table 15), one can see evidence of what<br />
would appear to be a highly variable relationship<br />
between sites. In Figure 27 the relationship between<br />
MNI and E for the caprine samples for<br />
three Near Eastern tell sites are plotted. Each of<br />
the distributions can be approximated by a<br />
straight line. This suggests that the effective num-