24.02.2013 Views

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pecan domestication has been a gradual process, initially consisting of thinning riverine woodlands to pure stands of<br />

pre-existing pecan trees. Wild pecan nuts are commercially attractive and usually preferred by bakers and confectioners<br />

because they are typically priced about 25% less than selected varieties; they are about 40% smaller, allowing the whole<br />

halves to be pleasingly presented on small cakes, candies, etc.; and they are comparable, if not superi<strong>or</strong>, in taste to selected<br />

varieties. M<strong>or</strong>e than 60% of current nut production in Texas comes from such trees with the remainder produced by vegetatively<br />

propagated varieties. Thus, the pecan landscape throughout the indigenous range consists of wild trees growing in<br />

mixed species woodlands, native pecan that has been thinned from woodlands, and vegetatively propagated <strong>or</strong>chards often<br />

found adjacent to one another. Management programs like fertilization, pesticide application, irrigation, and pruning range<br />

from being most intensive in <strong>or</strong>chards to virtually nonexistent in mixed species woodlands. This variety of habitats provides<br />

unique opp<strong>or</strong>tunities to examine many questions including effects of plant domestication on arthropods. Most investigations<br />

of the pecan arthropod complex have been spurred by economic considerations and have concentrated on species that pose<br />

economic threats <strong>or</strong> economic relief (Harris 1983). However, given the long, close association of the arthropod complex with<br />

the pecan and the physical proximity of the wild and cultivated varieties, the opp<strong>or</strong>tunity to interpret results of pecan arthropod<br />

interactions from other perspectives invites attention. The arthropod complex consists of m<strong>or</strong>e than a 100 phytophagous,<br />

predat<strong>or</strong>, and parasite species that have been associated with pecan from the earliest of times (Harris 1983).<br />

The blackmargined aphid (BMA) is a monophagous, multivoltine, obligat<strong>or</strong>ily alate, phloem feeder that overwinters<br />

as eggs placed in bark crevices and parthenogenetically infests pecan from sh<strong>or</strong>tly after budbreak until the fall some 7-8<br />

months later, when males are produced, mating occurs, and the overwintering egg population is established (Harris 1983).<br />

Seasonal phenology on wild trees typically consists of BMA densities initially below 1/leaf increasing to between 1-10<br />

aphids/leaf f<strong>or</strong> a 2-3 week period during the summer, and then returning to densities below l/leaf f<strong>or</strong> the remainder of the<br />

season. Orchard trees typically experience _>rivefold higher densities and exhibit BMA population increases earlier in the<br />

season that last f<strong>or</strong> 3-4 weeks (Liao et al. 1984).<br />

BLACKMARGINED APHID AS A KEYSTONE SPECIES<br />

Effects of BMA on nut production appear to be negligible in wild trees (Liao and Harris I984), and with one exception<br />

(Wood et al. 1987), on <strong>or</strong>chard trees. However, routine use of insecticide in the early season typically results in epidemics<br />

of pecan aphids (PA) (Monelliopsispecanis Bissell), mites, and leafminers (Harris 1988, 1991). The pecan aphid complex<br />

consisting of BMA and PA has particularly been considered a primary threat to nut production (Dutcher and Htay 1985,<br />

Beshears 11988). Population densities of BMA are typically an <strong>or</strong>der of magnitude lower than those of PA in such epidemics<br />

and, if the epidemic proceeds to defoliation, BMA is virtually absent during the latter stages (Bumroongsook and Harris<br />

1992).<br />

BMA outbreaks routinely occur once per season in nature, <strong>or</strong> can also be induced once following the use of broad<br />

spectrum insecticides. Cage studies show that BMA outbreaks occur 2-3 weeks after introducing BMA into natural enemy<br />

exclusion cages throughout the season on previously unexposed foliage (Edelson 1982, Liao and Harris 1984, Liao et al.<br />

1984, Liao et al. 1985, Bumroongsook and Harris 1992). These outbreaks naturally subside after 3-4 weeks, leaving intact<br />

photosynthetically active foliage (Bumroongsook and Harris 1992). BMA populations cannot reinfest the foliage f<strong>or</strong> at least<br />

a month after the first induced outbreak (Liao et al. 1984). BMA outbreaks can be curtailed by opening the exclusion cages<br />

bef<strong>or</strong>e the infestation has run its course <strong>or</strong> by introducing spiders <strong>or</strong> lady beetles into the cage at densities of about 1 per 10<br />

leaves (Liao et al. 1984). Lacewing, Chrysoperla rufilabris (Burmeister), oviposition increases as BMA densities increase.<br />

Lacewing egg densities are also higher on foliage exposed by opening cages containing an incipient outbreak of BMA (Liao<br />

et al. 1984). Spider densities increase as BMA densities increase, and spiders readily accept BMA as prey (Bumroongsook et<br />

al. 1992). Spider densities are also higher on foliage exposed by opening cages containing an incipient outbreak of BMA<br />

(Liao et al. 1984). M. pecanis is slower to outbreak on mature bearing trees (Bumroongsook and Harris 1992), and high<br />

densities result in defoliation whether the leaves have been conditioned by BMA <strong>or</strong> not, indicating these aphids are capable of<br />

causing m<strong>or</strong>e loss of foliage than BMA.<br />

These studies indicate that BMA may mitigate the impact of disruptions <strong>or</strong> natural declines of natural enemies in the<br />

pecan ecosystem by outbreaking and then attracting and reestablishing natural enemies to the system bef<strong>or</strong>e m<strong>or</strong>e insidious<br />

phytophages increase in density (Bumroongsook and Harris 1992). The effects of such a role would not be limited to the<br />

pecan aphid complex, but would extend to all phytophagous species serving as prey to the polyphagous lacewings, lady<br />

beetles, spiders, etc. (Liao et al. 1984), that respond to M. caryella.<br />

113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!