24.02.2013 Views

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DOUGLAS-FIR AND WESTERN LARCH DEFENSIVE REACTIONS TO<br />

LEPTOGRAPHIUM ABIETINUM AND OPHIOSTOMA PSEUDOTSUGAE<br />

DARRELL W. ROSS 1and HALVOR SOLHEIM 2<br />

_Department of F<strong>or</strong>est Science, Oregon State University, C<strong>or</strong>vallis, Oregon, 97331-7501, USA<br />

2N<strong>or</strong>wegian F<strong>or</strong>est <strong>Research</strong> Institute, Section of F<strong>or</strong>est Ecology, Division of F<strong>or</strong>est Pathology, N-1423 As-NLH, N<strong>or</strong>way<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins, is one of the most imp<strong>or</strong>tant insects associated with<br />

Douglas-fir, Psuedotsugae menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, in western N<strong>or</strong>th America (Furniss and Carolin 1977). At high population<br />

densities, the beetle is capable of causing significant tree m<strong>or</strong>tality and impacting f<strong>or</strong>est resource values (C<strong>or</strong>nelius 1955,<br />

Rudinsky 1966, Johnson and Belluschi 1969, Furniss and Orr 1978, Furniss et al. 1979). The Douglas-fir beetle usually<br />

breeds in recently dead <strong>or</strong> live Douglas-fir trees. The only other tree species in which the beetle has been rep<strong>or</strong>ted to successfully<br />

breed is western larch (Ross 1967). However, the beetle is apparently able to breed only in dead larch (Furniss et al.<br />

1981). Live larch may be attacked, but brood production from live trees has never been observed. Reed et al. (1986)<br />

compared various chemical and physical properties of Douglas-fir and western larch to identify possible reasons that brood<br />

fail to survive in live larch trees. Compared with Douglas-fir, larch had a higher content of 3-carene, thinner phloem, higher<br />

phloem moisture content, larger diameter vertical resin ducts, and lower ole<strong>or</strong>esin exudation pressure. The auth<strong>or</strong>s speculated<br />

that the high content of 3-carene in live larch may be responsible f<strong>or</strong> the failure of Douglas-fir beetle brood in those<br />

trees.<br />

One <strong>or</strong> m<strong>or</strong>e species of ophiostomatoid fungi are invariably associated with each species of conifer-infesting bark<br />

beetle (Whitney 1982, Harrington 1988). Although the ecological relationships among the fungi and bark beetles are not<br />

completely understood in many cases, there is evidence that some of these fungi help the beetles to overcome the natural<br />

defenses of mass attacked trees. Conifer response to invasion by bark beetles and their associated fungi involves two<br />

different systems: (1) the flow of pref<strong>or</strong>med resin from severed resin ducts and (2) the induced wound response <strong>or</strong> resistant<br />

reaction (Reid et al. 1967, Berryman 1972, Christiansen and H<strong>or</strong>ntvedt 1983). The dimensions of the induced response in<br />

host tree tissues are generally c<strong>or</strong>related to the growth of the fungi <strong>or</strong> the extent of mechanical damage associated with beetle<br />

tunneling (Ross et al. 1992, Lieutier 1993, Solheim 1993). If the fungi associated with the Douglas-fir beetle are involved in<br />

overcoming tree resistance, then a possible reason f<strong>or</strong> the failure of brood development in larch may be the inability of the<br />

fungi to survive and grow in larch. A significant variation in the pathogenicity of the fungi to Douglas-fir and western larch<br />

should he reflected by differences in the induced response following artificial inoculations.<br />

Despite a considerable amount of past research related to the biology and management of the Douglas-fir beetle, little<br />

is known about its funsal associates. The two species of ophiostomatoid fungi most commonly associated with the Douglasfir<br />

beetle are Ophiostoma pseudotsugae (Rumb.) yon Arx and Leptographium abietinum (Peck) Wingf. (Rumbold 1936,<br />

Harrington 1988, Solheim unpubl.). There are no published rep<strong>or</strong>ts on the pathogenicity of these fungi <strong>or</strong> their ecological<br />

relationships to the beetle. In 1993, we installed a study to evaluate the pathogenicity of these fungi to Douglas-fir. The final<br />

results of that study will be published elsewhere in the near future. At the same time, we installed a small test to assess the<br />

response of Douglas-fir and western larch, Larix occidentalis Nutt., to artificial inoculations with these fungi. The objective<br />

of our study was to measure the length of the induced response in the phloem of Douglas-fir and western larch following<br />

artificial inoculation with O. pseudotsugae and L. abietinum. This paper rep<strong>or</strong>ts the results of <strong>this</strong> test.<br />

Mattson, W.J., Niemela, E, and Rouse, M., eds. 1996. Dynamics of f<strong>or</strong>est herbiv<strong>or</strong>y: quest f<strong>or</strong> pattern and principle. <strong>USDA</strong><br />

F<strong>or</strong>. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-183, N.C. F<strong>or</strong>. Exp. Sta., St. Paul, MN 55108. i<br />

224

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!