24.02.2013 Views

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Connectivity Index (CI). The CI index is based on a run-length encoding strategy that is commonly used to<br />

encode raster (matrix) data. Run-length encoding is a good compression technique f<strong>or</strong> rasters that have a high degree of<br />

spatial autoc<strong>or</strong>relation. Run lengths are measured geometrically rather than arithmetically, giving m<strong>or</strong>e than linear value to<br />

longer runs. The computational procedures f<strong>or</strong> the CI index are given below.<br />

First, count the runs of matrix elements with the same value (i). F<strong>or</strong> example, 1l 11 would be a run of length L(1) =<br />

4. A row, column, <strong>or</strong> diagonal may have several runs. F<strong>or</strong> example, vect<strong>or</strong> 111222233333 has three runs. There can be<br />

multiple runs f<strong>or</strong> a given i.<br />

F<strong>or</strong> each row, column, <strong>or</strong> diagonal, we sum the runs f<strong>or</strong> each distinct element value. F<strong>or</strong> example, vect<strong>or</strong><br />

1112222211111 has three runs and two values. Converted to run values, the vect<strong>or</strong> is 123, 12345, 12345. The sum of runs,<br />

by element value, f<strong>or</strong> <strong>this</strong> vect<strong>or</strong> is ES(1) = 21 and ZS(2) = 15. F<strong>or</strong> a given run i of length L, the run value is S(i) = L * ( L +<br />

1 ) / 2. F<strong>or</strong> a given element value i, all possible S(i) are calculated by row, column, and diagonal, with the diagonal S(i)<br />

divided by 2.2 to compensate f<strong>or</strong> separation distance. The total run value f<strong>or</strong> a matrix and a given i is simply the ZS(i) f<strong>or</strong><br />

that matrix.<br />

F<strong>or</strong> the general NXN matrix, the smallest possible ZS(i), i = 1 to n where n is the number of different values, is<br />

ZSmin(i) = 2 ( N2+ N2/2 -2).<br />

ZSmin(i) exists where all run lengths are 1. The largest possible value, ZSmax(i), must be calculated using NXN<br />

matrix of constant i.<br />

Thus, the range is<br />

The unweighted CI is calculated as<br />

ESmax(i) = NZ(N+I) + 2(Z K(K+I))/2 z - N(N+I)/2 2<br />

R = ZSmax(i) - ZSmin(i).<br />

H = (ES(i) - ESmin(i)) / R.<br />

The CI f<strong>or</strong> a matrix where i values are relative to a function (i.e., hazard rating <strong>or</strong> probable use) can also be computed.<br />

The run values are calculated as weighted sums (WCI).<br />

WCI = 1; i(_:S(i)), i = 1,2 .....<br />

The Spatial Interaction Index. The third index of heterogeneity is based upon the gravity model and is sensitive to<br />

fragmentation of the highest valued landscape elements. When applied to geographic analysis, the gravity model is called<br />

spatial interaction. Theref<strong>or</strong>e, we have called <strong>this</strong> index spatial interaction (SI).<br />

SI is based on Newton's law of attraction between masses. It states that attraction is prop<strong>or</strong>tional to the product of<br />

two masses (assigned weight) and inversely prop<strong>or</strong>tional to the distance between them. F<strong>or</strong> a matrix of landscape elements<br />

represented in matrix f<strong>or</strong>m:<br />

, k = 1, where<br />

mkand ml are distinct elements of the matrix representing the attraction measure, r is the distance separating mk and m,, and t is<br />

the maximum value in the matrix.<br />

Functional Heterogeneity of F<strong>or</strong>est Landscapes and Host Defenses<br />

In <strong>this</strong> section we examine functional heterogeneity of f<strong>or</strong>est landscapes in relation to epidemiology of D. frontalis.<br />

Our approach is to provide (i) a general overview of the procedure used to characterize functional heterogeneity, (ii) illustrate<br />

how the methodology facilitates integration of intbrmation on landscape structure and natural hist<strong>or</strong>y of D. frontalis, and (iii)<br />

conclude with an interpretation of how host defenses influence epidemiology of the insect. 277

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!