24.02.2013 Views

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

investigation. Sampling was done on 3 occasions at 2-week-intervals during needle expansion in spring: needles were taken<br />

from twigs of the upper crown region, where the sawflies prefer to oviposit. To rec<strong>or</strong>d differences between the physiologically<br />

older needles at the bottom and the physiologically younger needles at the top of a given shoot, on the second and third<br />

occasion needles were separated acc<strong>or</strong>ding to their location on the expanding bud: top (t), middle (m), and bottom (b)<br />

needles.<br />

In contrast to stand A, the trees on stand B were undergoing an actual heavy sawfly attack during the sampling period<br />

in spring 1989. Additionally, large variation in the timing of bud burst of the trees was found: the early flushing individuals<br />

flushed 4 weeks bef<strong>or</strong>e the late flushing ones. Sawfly attack, however, occurred only on the late flushing trees. The early<br />

flushing trees (n = 10) were harvested 3 times (1,2,3), the late flushing trees (n = 10) only twice (la, 2a). After the second<br />

sampling of the attacked, late flushing trees (2a), the larvae were fully grown and were no longer feeding. Although the<br />

sampling on early and late flushing trees differed by m<strong>or</strong>e than 4 weeks, needles from sampling date 1 c<strong>or</strong>responded phenologically<br />

with 1a and needles from sampling date 2 c<strong>or</strong>responded with 2a.<br />

A fertilization experiment was done on stand C with late flushing, attacked trees. The stand was fertilized with 130<br />

kg nitrogen per ha/year, applied on 4 occasions: in summer 1989, in spring and summer 1990, and in spring 1991. Sampling<br />

was done during needle expansion in June, 1991, from 15 fertilized and 17 unfertilized (i.e., control) trees.<br />

Samples f<strong>or</strong> chemical analyses were put into liquid nitrogen, then freeze-dried and milled. Nitrogen (total and<br />

soluble) was determined by micro-Kjeldahl technique with selenium as catalyst. Soluble carbohydrates (sugars, cyclitols) as<br />

well as the <strong>or</strong>ganic acids (quinic acid, shikimic acid) were determined by GLC, starch content was estimated enzymatically as<br />

glucose-equivalents. Needle phenolics were defined and determined as the potential of the needle extract (done with boiling<br />

50% aqueous methanol) to precipitate bovine serum albumin (BSA). Abs<strong>or</strong>ption was measured at 590 nm. Fiber (cellulose,<br />

hemicellulose, lignin) was estimated after a method to determine the fiber content of cattle food: after hydrolyzation with<br />

strong acids and alkalines and heating up to 550 degrees, the remaining ash residue was weighed. All values are expressed on<br />

a dry weight basis.<br />

Larval experiments were perf<strong>or</strong>med at stand C with late flushing, fertilized, and unfertilized trees in spring 1991.<br />

Larvae from naturally attacked buds as well as larvae (lst to 3rd instar) placed on expanding buds and enclosed in cages were<br />

studied. After cocoon f<strong>or</strong>mation, larvae were collected, sexed, and weighed. Parasitized larvae were excluded from the<br />

analyses.<br />

RESULTS<br />

During initial feeding in mid-May (bud length 4 cm) the young sawfly larvae are confronted with both high total and<br />

soluble nitrogen (2% N tot. and 0.2% N sol.) and <strong>or</strong>ganic acid concentrations (12%). On the other hand, carbohydrates<br />

(sugars and cyclitols) and starch are at rather low levels (8% and 2%). Fiber was approximately 10% of the needle dry<br />

weight (dw). F<strong>or</strong> all these traits, damaged and undamaged trees did not differ (Fig. 1, upper graph). The crucial difference,<br />

however, was the phenolics: concentrations were significantly lower in the attacked trees than in the unattacked trees<br />

(p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!