24.02.2013 Views

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

our Additive hypothesis. Fritz et al. (1994) found supp<strong>or</strong>t f<strong>or</strong> the Additive, Dominance, and Hybrid Susceptibility hypotheses<br />

among herbiv<strong>or</strong>e and a pathogen species on hybrid and parental willows. The purposes of <strong>this</strong> paper are to investigate the<br />

responses of I 1 herbiv<strong>or</strong>e species from different guilds to parental and hybrid willows over three consecutive years, and to<br />

determine if herbiv<strong>or</strong>e responses to hybrid plants vary over time. This paper will show that different herbiv<strong>or</strong>es, even those<br />

in the same guild, vary dramatically in their response to hybrid versus parental taxa, but that most species, when considered<br />

over time, fit the Additive Hypothesis.<br />

METHODS AND MATERIALS<br />

The System<br />

This system has several advantages f<strong>or</strong> studying herbiv<strong>or</strong>e-hybrid plant interactions. The two willow species that<br />

hybridize often co-occur in the same habitats with their hybrids, eliminating, to a certain extent, confounding environmental<br />

variation across naturally occurring hybrid zones with herbiv<strong>or</strong>e resistance variation among hybrids and parents. Willows<br />

have a number of herbiv<strong>or</strong>e species in different guilds, including gall-f<strong>or</strong>mers, leaf miners, leaf tiers, and chewers, that are<br />

welt characterized and that have been studied extensively on one of the willow species in <strong>this</strong> system.<br />

Salix sericea Marshall and Salix. eriocephala Michx. co-occur in swamps and along streams in central New Y<strong>or</strong>k. S.<br />

sericea is a 0.5-4-m-high shrub that has lanceolate leaves with densely sericeous hairs on the lower leaf surface. Stipules are<br />

small, lanceolate, and usually absent from older leaf nodes (i.e., stipules are deciduous). This species occurs predominantly<br />

in swamps from Canada south through the n<strong>or</strong>theastern U.S. and along the Appalachian range to Ge<strong>or</strong>gia (Argus 1986). S.<br />

eriocephala is a shrub that may reach 6 m in height, and its leaves are lanceolate to narrowly oblong and glabrous beneath.<br />

Stipules are large, persistent, half ovate, and half c<strong>or</strong>date at the base. It frequently occurs along streams, and its range<br />

extends from Canada south as far as Virginia and west to Missouri (Argus 1986). The ranges of the two species are broadly<br />

sympatric, and at the study site both species co-occur and intermingle. Species can be easily distinguished in the field based<br />

on leaf, stipule, and bud characteristics (Argus 1986).<br />

These willow species hybridize to f<strong>or</strong>m plants that are usually distinctive from each parent. Large, persistent, halfovate<br />

stipules (a S. eriocephala trait) and a sericeous (hairy) lower leaf surface (a S. sericea trait) serve as m<strong>or</strong>phological<br />

markers to identify S. sericea x S. eriocephala hybrids in the field (Fritz et al. 1994). The natural hybrids at the study site do<br />

not appear to be extra<strong>or</strong>dinary; S. eriocephala and S. sericea have been rep<strong>or</strong>ted to hybridize throughout their range (Argus<br />

1974, t986; Mosseler and Papadopol 1989). Flowering phenology may explain the occurrence of hybridization between S.<br />

sericea and S. eriocephala (Argus 1974, Mosseler and Papadopol 1989), which differ by only a few days in the onset of<br />

flowering (foliage phenology is also similar) (Fritz, pets. obs.).<br />

Many herbiv<strong>or</strong>es attack the parental and hybrid willows. Each herbiv<strong>or</strong>e species attacks both parental willow species<br />

and hybrids. Gall-f<strong>or</strong>ming sawflies (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae) include Phyllocolpa nigrita, Phyllocolpa sp. nov.,<br />

Phyllocolpa terminalis, and Pontania sp. (leaf galls). Gall-f<strong>or</strong>ming flies (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) include the stem gallers<br />

Rabdophaga rigidae, the beaked willow gall; R. salicisbrassicoides, the willow cabbage gall; and a leaf galler, Iteomyia<br />

salic(folia. The other common leaf galler species is the gall mite Aculops tetanothrix (Acarina: Eriophyidae). There are two<br />

species of leaf miners, Phyllon<strong>or</strong>ycter salicifoliella and Phyllocnistis sp. (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), that commonly f<strong>or</strong>m<br />

mines on willow leaves.<br />

There are two frequently seen leaf folder species (Lepidoptera) that have distinctive leaf folds, but have not yet been<br />

successfully reared <strong>or</strong> identified. One species (LF) folds over and sews the leaf margin to the lamina with silk. The other<br />

species (V) f<strong>or</strong>ms a tube of the leaf tip by sewing the edges of the leaf blade together.<br />

Methods<br />

These studies were perf<strong>or</strong>med from 1991 to 1993 at the Sosnowski site 3 km west of Milf<strong>or</strong>d, NY, along County<br />

Route 44. All plants are individually marked at the study site. Censuses of herbiv<strong>or</strong>es species on 14 S. eriocephala, 29 S.<br />

sericea, and 16 hybrids were conducted from late July to early August 1991. In 1992, we censused 20 S. eriocephala, 36 S.<br />

sericea, and 39 hybrids, and in 1993 we censused 40 S. eriocephala, 109 S. sericea, and 38 hybrids. Mostly hybrid plants<br />

known to be Fl-types (Fritz et al. 1994) were included in the hybrid categ<strong>or</strong>y. Plants known to be backcrosses from RAPD<br />

were not included in <strong>this</strong> analysis. Some hybrid plants added to the census group after 1991 have not been examined f<strong>or</strong> their<br />

RAPD genotype, and it is theref<strong>or</strong>e possible that they are something other than Fl-types (Fritz et al. 1994).<br />

134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!