View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...
View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...
View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The objectives of <strong>this</strong> presentation are to (i) review measures taken by various agencies in British Columbia to<br />
elucidate the interrelationship between the weevil and its host, (ii) discuss studies in progress to take advantage of the genetic<br />
resistance of the host and (iii) present an overview of attempts to control one of the m<strong>or</strong>e destructive f<strong>or</strong>est pests. The<br />
presentation will also review future plans.<br />
Prince Ge<strong>or</strong>ge Progeny Trials<br />
WEEVIL RESEARCH<br />
Field Studies<br />
Due to the imp<strong>or</strong>tance of interi<strong>or</strong> spruce in British Columbia, a decision was made to embark on the genetic improvement<br />
of the species complex in the early 1960's. The seni<strong>or</strong> auth<strong>or</strong> was hired to carry out <strong>this</strong> project in 1967.<br />
The basic approach to improving interi<strong>or</strong> spruce was to designate geographically distinct areas (selection units <strong>or</strong><br />
SU's) and select trees based on size and f<strong>or</strong>m in each selection unit (Kiss and Yeh 1988, Kiss and Yanchuk 1991). The first<br />
of these selection units was in the Prince Ge<strong>or</strong>ge area. A total of 180 parent trees were selected. Cones and scions were<br />
collected from most selected parents. Scions were used to establish clone banks, and seeds were used to establish genetic<br />
tests.<br />
As part of the improvement program, genetic tests were established using open-pollinated progenies of individual<br />
parents selected in various selection units. The first set of these tests, representing the Prince Ge<strong>or</strong>ge SU, was established in<br />
1972 and 1973 (Kiss and Yeh 1988, Kiss and Yanchuk 1991) using the open-pollinated progenies of 173 parent trees.<br />
The initial objective of the genetic tests was to identify well-perf<strong>or</strong>ming families based on the growth perf<strong>or</strong>mance of<br />
their progenies. This inf<strong>or</strong>mation aided in the construction of rogued first generation seed <strong>or</strong>chards and helped to identify<br />
candidates f<strong>or</strong> advanced generation breeding. To <strong>this</strong> end, periodic height measurements were carried out and at age 15<br />
diameter measurements were also made.<br />
Following the 15-year height and diameter assessments, heavy infestation of white pine weevil was observed at some<br />
test sites. Curs<strong>or</strong>y observation appeared to suggest a pattern to the infestation. Further studies confirmed <strong>this</strong> pattern and<br />
revealed the possibility of genetically controlled resistance mechanism(s) in a number of families. Results of <strong>this</strong> study are<br />
rep<strong>or</strong>ted by Kiss and Yanchuk (1991).<br />
In summary, the results showed that:<br />
1. While there were different intensities of attack at the three individual test sites in the Prince Ge<strong>or</strong>ge SU tests<br />
(i.e., 9% at Quesnel, 37% at Red Rock, and 63% at Aleza Lake), there were significant c<strong>or</strong>relations between<br />
families attacked across sites (Figs. 1 and 2).<br />
2. The estimate of family-mean heritability f<strong>or</strong> weevil resistance across sites was high (h2f=0.77 + 0.11).<br />
3. Families exhibiting greater vig<strong>or</strong> at any age were generally m<strong>or</strong>e resistant. C<strong>or</strong>relation between 6-year family<br />
height and incidence of weevil attack was negative and significant (Fig. 3, r=-0.42), as well as 15-year height<br />
and incidence of weevil attack (Fig. 4, r=-0.68). In fact, when families were ranked based on height growth at<br />
different ages, and average attack was calculated f<strong>or</strong> the top and bottom 25% of families, the top families<br />
always had significantly lower attacks than those of the bottom families (Table 1).<br />
151