View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...
View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...
View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Qualitative Changes in [,eaves and Larval Growth<br />
Leaf"toughness, like leaf"density, decreased following clipping of the leaves: it was only 85.7% of the control the<br />
year following the 1 year treatment and 69.8% of the control after the 2 year treatment (Fig. 6). Nitrogen content was almost<br />
the same in untreated trees tot 3 years (1991-1993) but decreased after leaves were clipped. It was 2.23-2.26% bef<strong>or</strong>e the<br />
treatment, 2.00-2.05% the year following the 1 year treatment (ca. 10% reduction), and 1.88% the year following the 2 year<br />
treatment (16.6% reduction) (Fig. 7a). The N content following the 1 year treatment was almost the same in 1992 and 1993.<br />
These results clearly indicate that nitrogen content is reduced by defoliation and is influenced not by the year but by the<br />
degree of defoliation. Tannin content, however, increased the year following leaf clipping (Fig. 7b). When 2 mg of BSA was<br />
added, about 0.4 mg of the protein was precipitated in the regimes of 2 year treatment and 1 year treatment, although precipitation<br />
was not detected in the control regime. Furtherm<strong>or</strong>e, when 3 mg of BSA was added, no precipitation was recognized<br />
in the 1 year treatment <strong>or</strong> the control regimes, but 0.43 mg of the protein was precipitated following the 2 year treatment.<br />
These quantitative and qualitative changes in beech following defoliation supp<strong>or</strong>t that the trees were less vig<strong>or</strong>ous after<br />
defoliation, and also less suitable f<strong>or</strong> herbiv<strong>or</strong>es because of the declining nitrogen and increasing tannins.<br />
180<br />
160 I "<br />
z J 153.5<br />
[<br />
co |<br />
140<br />
131.7<br />
c<br />
= 120<br />
0<br />
F---<br />
100<br />
(:D<br />
107.2<br />
L_ ............. 1<br />
--J T<br />
80 ' ' ................<br />
2 Yr Treatment 1 Yr Treatment C0ntr0]<br />
Figure 6._Leaf toughness of beechleavesin the year following artificial defoliation. The number is a mean value, bar<br />
means maximum and minimum value, and upper and lower sides of box are one standard err<strong>or</strong>.<br />
Surviv<strong>or</strong>ship rates on beech saplings were determined using the number of hatched larvae as a base. The x-axis in<br />
Figure 8 is the number of days following egg attachment on June 30th. Although approximately half of the larvae reared on<br />
the control saplings survived to maturity, only about 10% of those reared on the 2 year treatment trees survived to maturity.<br />
Many of the latter died during early stages of larval development. Surviv<strong>or</strong>ship on the 1 year treatment was intermediate<br />
between the 2 year treatment and the control. Both female and male body size declined f<strong>or</strong> larvae reared on clipped saplings,<br />
as did adult body size (Fig. 9). In the 2 year treatment regime, body size was smaller than of the 1 year treatment regime, and<br />
was just three quarters of that in the control. Defoliation lowers beech quality which, in turn, lowers larval surviv<strong>or</strong>ship and<br />
body size.<br />
Population Quality of Herbiv<strong>or</strong>e in Three Sites<br />
Test f<strong>or</strong> Maternal Effects and Food Deteri<strong>or</strong>ation in the Field<br />
The larvae from Site A had smaller body size (p < 0.01 t-test) than those from the other two regions (Fig. 10). This<br />
tendency was exactly the same f<strong>or</strong> males and females, as well as f<strong>or</strong> mature larvae and f<strong>or</strong> pupae. No difference was found<br />
between the Site B and C populations. Thus it can be said that even three generations after an outbreak, the quality of the<br />
Site A population was less than that of the populations from the other two regions where density was increasing.<br />
75