24.02.2013 Views

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RESULTS<br />

Field Rearing Experiment<br />

The production of staminate flox_ers significantly affected spruce budw<strong>or</strong>m larval biology (9: Wilk's lambda F[2,171<br />

= 18.3, p = 0.0(_1, if: Wilk's lambda F[2,171 = 13. l, p = 0.0004) (Fig. 1, 2). Larval biolog 5 also significantly xaried<br />

acc<strong>or</strong>ding to crown sections (9: Wilk's lambda F[2,17] = 458.6, p = 0.0001 ; Of: Wilk's lambda F:[2,171= 331.8, p = 0.0001).<br />

However, the interaction between flo_vering class and crown section was significant (9: Wilk's lambda F[2,17] = 329.3, p =<br />

0.0(X)I o": Wilk's lambda F[2,17] = 549.9, p = 0.0001). This significant interaction results from the fact that floxvering<br />

affected budw<strong>or</strong>m biology only in the midcrown of flowering trees where staminate flowers were available f<strong>or</strong> consumption<br />

(Figs. 1, 2).<br />

F F NF NF<br />

o_ a a<br />

E loo ab<br />

,,,,,,.-1<br />

..c:<br />

.__ 80 a<br />

.c<br />

0"J<br />

a<br />

-<br />

)<br />

7<br />

a<br />

o<br />

.._<br />

Ck<br />

60<br />

-'i<br />

[1.. 40<br />

2o<br />

o ,,,,, ,i =,.,.<br />

Figure 1.--Pupal weight of male and female spruce budw<strong>or</strong>m reared in the midcrown and the lower sections (*) of flowering<br />

(F) and nonflowering (NF) balsam fir trees. Staminate flowers were present only in the midcrown of flowering trees<br />

(n = 10 trees). F<strong>or</strong> a given sex, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p < 0.05).<br />

Both male and female budw<strong>or</strong>ms that had access to staminate flowers in the midcrown of flowering trees exhibited 5<br />

d sh<strong>or</strong>ter development time (9: F[1,18] = 32.7, p = 0.0001; _: F[1,18] = 27. l, p = 0.0001) and 9_'_(9) to 15% (o_) reduced<br />

pupal weight (9: F[1,18] = 12.3, p = 0.0026; if: F[1,1811= 4.9, p = 0.0397) compared to those located where staminate<br />

flowers were not available f<strong>or</strong> consumption. However, no significant impact of flowering on budw<strong>or</strong>m survival was detected<br />

(Chi-square = 75, df = 69, p = 0.28, n = 40) (Fig. 3).<br />

Insects reared on flowering branches had lower fecundity (F[ 1,18] = 10.8, p = 0.0041) than those reared on nonflowering<br />

branches (Fig. 4), but they produced individual eggs of similar weight (F[1,8] = 1.8, p = 0.21) (Fig. 5). At the end of<br />

the 29 week long diapause period, no significant difference was detected in terms of survival of the progeny maintained at<br />

2°C during their diapausing stage (Chi-square = 132, df = 129, p = 0.41, n = 46) (Fig. 6).<br />

Flowering branches produced significantly less current-year R_liagethan nonflowering branches (F[1,181 = 4.4, p =<br />

0.04) (Fig. 7). Although the insects reared on flowering branches removed approximately the same amount of current-year<br />

foliage as those reared on nonflowering branches (F[1,1811= 1.95, p = 0.18), they back-fed on 1-year old foliage, while the<br />

others did not (F[l, 18] = 23, p = 0.0(Y01) (Fig. 7). This indicates a possible reduction in the nutritive quality of the currentfoliage<br />

produced by flowering branches.<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!