24.02.2013 Views

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

View or print this publication - Northern Research Station - USDA ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

oo0<br />

a b<br />

ol<br />

¢' _achiman_i ()® 1,eAppi (C_<br />

Figure 1.---Locations of beech f<strong>or</strong>ests which have had been conspicuously defoliated by Q. punctatelIa (dark shading), and<br />

three study sites: Hakkohda (Site A), Hachimantai (Site B), and Appi (Site C).<br />

Estimation of Larval Density<br />

The density of Q. punctatella in each plot was estimated by trapping frass pellets of the last instar larvae, because<br />

defoliation is mostly the result of its feeding (Kamata and Yanbe, 1993). The density can usually be estimated by the<br />

following equation: Density = Total number of frass pellets per square meter/630, where 630 is mean number of frass<br />

pellets during last instar stage. Because density is underestimated when larval density becomes high and conspicuous<br />

defbliation occurs, the density must be calculated by the following equation: log,0 (Density) = 0.988"1og,0 X + 0.898,<br />

where X is the maximum number of frass pellets per day per square meter (Kamata and Igarashi, 1994a).<br />

Adult Number and Size<br />

Adult numbers were measured at Site B. Two light traps were set in an open area in a small valley surrounded by a<br />

f<strong>or</strong>est of predominantly beech. The distance between the two traps was 10m and both were 20m from the nearest edge of<br />

the beech f<strong>or</strong>est where the heaviest defoliation had occurred in a 1981 outbreak. Each light trap had two blue flu<strong>or</strong>escent<br />

bulbs (20W) and a basin with water and kerosene. The relative numbers were estimated by the total catches during the<br />

20 days from June 1lth to 30th, because the peak of the adult catches was in mid- to late June (Kamata and Igarashi,<br />

1994). Body size of the adult greatly influenced fecundity, but the fecundity of a trapped female cannot be estimated<br />

directly <strong>or</strong> indirectly from body weight, because both measurements decrease rapidly after emergence due to oviposition<br />

(Kamata and Igarashi 1995a). Rather, the area of f<strong>or</strong>ewing, which showed a good c<strong>or</strong>relation with both fecundity and<br />

adult weight, was used as a substitute measurement of body size and fecundity (Kamata and Igarashi 1995c). The area<br />

was theref<strong>or</strong>e measured by digitizer to the nearest mm z and its annual change was compared with population dynamics.<br />

In Site A, one light trap, which had two blue flu<strong>or</strong>escent bulbs (20W) and no basin, was set in a bare area ca. 20 m apart<br />

from the edge of beech f<strong>or</strong>est completely defoliated in 1990. A sheet of white, finely-meshed cotton cloth (1.8m x 1.8m)<br />

was set behind the trap and adults were caught on it. This survey was conducted several days each year from 1988 to<br />

1993. Area of the beech caterpillar's f<strong>or</strong>ewing was also measured. 69<br />

\

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!