09.03.2013 Views

Contents - Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme

Contents - Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme

Contents - Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.17 Quantum Criticality out of Equilibrium: Steady States and Effective Temperatures<br />

Quantum phase transitions are of extensive current interest<br />

in a variety of strongly correlated electronic and<br />

atomic systems [1]. A quantum critical point occurs<br />

when such transitions are second order. As a consequence,<br />

there is no intrinsic energy scale in the excitation<br />

spectrum of a quantum critical state. Outof-equilibrium<br />

states near quantum phase transitions<br />

have so far received only limited theoretical attention<br />

despite a long-standing interest in their classical<br />

counterparts. Experimentally, on the other hand,<br />

it seems unavoidable to generate out-of-equilibrium<br />

states during a measurement in the quantum critical<br />

regime as this regime is characterized by the absence<br />

of any intrinsic scale. Any measurement may therefore<br />

potentially perturb the system beyond the linear<br />

response regime where the fluctuation-dissipation theorem<br />

(FDT) no longer holds. To make progress theoretically,<br />

approaches are needed that can capture the<br />

scaling properties of a quantum critical point in equilibrium<br />

and that can be extended to out of equilibrium<br />

settings. This is impeded by the lack of a general understanding<br />

of how to generalize the free energy functional<br />

to stationary nonequilibrium states from which<br />

scaling relations could be obtained.<br />

We have identified a system in which quantum criticality<br />

out of equilibrium can be systematically studied<br />

[2,3]. It was shown earlier that single-electron transistors<br />

(SET) attached to ferromagnetic leads can undergo<br />

a continuous quantum phase transition as their<br />

gate voltage is tuned [4]. The corresponding quantum<br />

critical point separates a Fermi liquid phase from a non-<br />

Fermi liquid one. The key physics is the critical destruction<br />

of the Kondo effect, which underlies a new<br />

class of quantum criticality that has been argued to apply<br />

to heavy fermion metals [5].<br />

(a) (b)<br />

J<br />

Vg<br />

µ 1<br />

Q<br />

µ 2<br />

D<br />

Kondo<br />

Figure 1: (a) Schematic setup of the magnetic SET. The arrows in the<br />

left and right leads indicate the direction of the magnetization in the<br />

leads. For antiparallel alignment, the local magnetic field generated<br />

by the leads vanishes. (b) Phase diagram: the Fermi liquid phase<br />

(“Kondo”) and the critical local moment (“LM”) phase are separated<br />

by a QCP. The voltage Vg allows to tune the system through a quantum<br />

phase transition.<br />

Vg<br />

STEFAN KIRCHNER, QIMIAO SI 4<br />

4 Department of Physics & Astronomy, Rice University, Houston.<br />

QC<br />

g c<br />

LM<br />

g<br />

The couplings of the local degrees of freedom to the<br />

conduction electrons and to the magnons in the leads<br />

allow for a dynamical competition between the Kondo<br />

singlet formation and the magnon drag. As a result, the<br />

low-energy properties are governed by a Bose-Fermi<br />

Kondo model (BFKM) [4, 6].<br />

Hbfk = <br />

Ji,jS · c † σ<br />

i,j<br />

k,k ′ ,σ,σ ′<br />

+ <br />

k,i,σ<br />

+ g <br />

β,q,i<br />

k,σ,i<br />

2 c σ ′ ,j<br />

˜ǫ kσi c †<br />

kσi ckσi + hlocSz<br />

Sβ(φβ,q,i + φ †<br />

<br />

β,q,i ) + ωq φ<br />

β,q,i<br />

†<br />

β,q,iφβ,q,i. where i,jε{L,R} and hloc = g <br />

i mi, is a local magnetic<br />

field with mL/mR being the ordered moment of the<br />

left/right leads. For antiparallel alignment and equal<br />

couplings one finds mL = −mR. ˜ǫkσi is the Zeemanshifted<br />

conduction electron dispersion, and φβ,i, with<br />

β = x,y, describes the magnon excitations. The spectrum<br />

of the bosonic modes is determined by the density<br />

of states of the magnons, <br />

q [δ(ω − ωq) − δ(ω + ωq)] ∼<br />

|ω| 1/2 sgn(ω) up to some cutoff Λ. A sketch of the magnetic<br />

SET is shown in Fig. 1(a). The resulting equilibrium<br />

phase diagram of the system is displayed in<br />

Fig. 1(b). Nonequilibrium states can be created by<br />

keeping left and right lead at different chemical potentials<br />

but the same temperature T , (eV = µL − µR).<br />

For such a finite bias voltage, we work on the Keldysh<br />

contour. The current-carrying steady state at arbitrary<br />

bias voltage V has been explicitly studied by an extension<br />

of the dynamical large-N limit onto the Keldysh<br />

contour [2]. The dynamical large-N limit in equilibrium<br />

has been shown to correctly capture the dynamical<br />

scaling properties (including, in particular, the<br />

finite-temperature relaxational properties) of the N = 2<br />

case [4, 7]. For a finite bias voltage, we work on the<br />

Keldysh contour. Since we are interested in the steady<br />

state limit, we specify the state of the system at the infinite<br />

past t0 = −∞, so that at finite time all initial correlations<br />

will have washed out.<br />

In this model system, we have shown that the universal<br />

scaling is obeyed by the steady state current,<br />

the pertinent spectral densities, and the associated<br />

fluctuation-dissipation ratios. We have been able to calculate<br />

the entire scaling function for each of these nonequilibrium<br />

quantities. This allows us to elucidate the<br />

concept of effective temperatures. Our theoretical approach<br />

can even be extended to study the transient behavior<br />

and other non-equilibrium probes of quantum<br />

74 Selection of Research Results

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!