29.09.2012 Views

Technology Status - NET Nowak Energie & Technologie AG

Technology Status - NET Nowak Energie & Technologie AG

Technology Status - NET Nowak Energie & Technologie AG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18<br />

● The highest potential for cost reduction among the renewable electricity<br />

technologies are a) expensive and b) recent in development. They tend to<br />

have a steep learning curve with a progress ratio of about 80%, meaning<br />

that every doubling of the volume manufactured leads to a cost reduction<br />

of about 20%. Globally, solar technologies are expected to reduce their<br />

costs by some 30%-50% for each of the next two decades as a result of<br />

learning and market growth.<br />

● Medium cost reduction potential can be identified among those<br />

technologies that are a) in the low to medium cost range and b) relatively<br />

recent in development. They tend to have a learning curve with a progress<br />

ratio of around 90%, meaning that every doubling of the volume<br />

manufactured leads to a cost reduction of around 10%. Globally, wind<br />

is expected to reduce its costs by some 25% for each of the next two<br />

decades on this basis, and geothermal by some 10%-25% in the same<br />

periods.<br />

● Smaller cost reduction potential is likely among the most mature<br />

technologies; the learning curve for these technologies and their<br />

components is fairly flat. Globally, technological development for<br />

small hydropower and biomass is much slower, likely on the order of<br />

about 5%-10% for each of the next two decades. Specifically,<br />

conventional components (civil works, turbines) offer low cost reduction<br />

potential, likely on the order of about 5%-10% for each of the next two<br />

decades.<br />

● Cost Structure, Investment and Generation Cost<br />

A particular feature of renewable power is the wide range of investment and<br />

generating cost they exhibit. Table 2 presents the ranges of investment and<br />

generating cost presented for 2002 and projections for 2010. These ranges<br />

reflect the variety of technologies for each renewable power source, the large<br />

number of possible applications and the multiplicity of resources. Renewable<br />

costs depend on the physical and geographic context, and the system definition<br />

as well as the policy environment. Average indicators for renewable power<br />

generation costs are thus not well suited to display their competitiveness in<br />

either the off-grid or on-grid market in a given country or system.<br />

All the renewable technologies assessed in this book have high up-front<br />

investment costs. Capital cost depreciation and interest costs are, thus, the<br />

major factor influencing generation costs. There are no fuel costs with the<br />

exception of biomass. While operating and maintenance costs (O&M) are<br />

generally low compared to conventional power generation, there are marked<br />

differences among the technologies in the area of maintenance.<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY X

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!