29.09.2012 Views

Technology Status - NET Nowak Energie & Technologie AG

Technology Status - NET Nowak Energie & Technologie AG

Technology Status - NET Nowak Energie & Technologie AG

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

from USD 10 to 18 per W. Off-grid systems greater than 1 kW show slightly less<br />

variation and lower costs. This wide range is probably due to country and<br />

project-specific factors, especially the required storage capacity. For example,<br />

in the US Southwest, DC systems with four to five days of storage capacity can<br />

be installed. A local retailer can profitably install a simple system with PV<br />

arrays, mounting hardware, charge controller and a lead-acid, deep-cycle<br />

battery bank for USD 10-13 per W. In a moderate climate, an AC system with<br />

ten days of storage capacity, a stand-alone inverter and ground-mounted<br />

hardware can be installed for USD 13-17 per W. High-reliability systems for<br />

industrial uses in moderate climates with 20 days of storage, all-weather<br />

mounts, battery enclosures and system controllers cost at least USD 20 per W.<br />

Generation Costs<br />

Investment costs are one of most important factors determining the cost of<br />

the electricity generated from PV installations. Operation and maintenance<br />

costs are relatively low, typically between 1% and 3% of investment costs, and<br />

the lifetime of PV modules is 20 to 30 years. However, inverters and batteries<br />

have to be replaced every five to ten years, more frequently in hot climates.<br />

While “harmonised” investment costs (same components and systems in<br />

different areas) are relatively similar, kWh costs depend greatly on the solar<br />

irradiation level. Electrical output is roughly proportional to the incident light<br />

reaching the active area. Hence, an efficient PV system receiving 1,100 kWh of<br />

solar irradiation per year and per square meter may produce 110 kWh of<br />

electricity per year and per square meter in most areas of Germany. The same<br />

system receiving 1,900 kWh of solar irradiation per year and per square meter<br />

may produce 190 kWh of electricity per year and per square meter in some<br />

areas of California. The electricity costs 40% less in the second case, where<br />

irradiation is about 70% greater. Electricity output also depends on other<br />

factors like operating temperature, reflectivity and share of diffuse light.<br />

Based on system investment and annual electrical output (but ignoring other<br />

factors such as risk and the environment), generation costs can be estimated<br />

for a range of applications (see Figure 19). Today’s lowest generation costs<br />

(20 to 30 USD cents per kWh) occur with installations having low investment<br />

costs (around USD 4,500) and high energy output (over 1,500 kWh per kW<br />

per year). In the best locations, these costs can fall below 20 USD cents per<br />

kWh over the lifetime of the system.<br />

Cost-competitiveness is greatest where high solar irradiation coincides with<br />

daily (peak) power demand. In Japan, a system cost level of USD 3,000 is<br />

projected to be reached in four to six years.<br />

3<br />

SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC POWER<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!