Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
“dialogue,” rather a unilateral discourse based on assumptions that relied mostly on<br />
stereotypes of gender (65).<br />
105<br />
This stigmatization of the Gothic audience contains a strong ideological bias that<br />
aimed to regulate the production of literature by establishing distinct hierarchies. David<br />
Richter uses Jauss’ theory of reader response to argue that the appearance of the Gothic<br />
novel marked a shift in the pattern of reader response to literature:<br />
The Gothic novel sits astride a major shift … a shift from catharsis<br />
to aesthesis, or in basic English, a shift from reading for<br />
information, and for the sake of entry into a verisimilar world<br />
otherwise inaccessible to the reader, toward reading as an escape<br />
from the world one inhabits into an inner site of fantasy. (112-113)<br />
As briefly mentioned above, this shift in readership runs parallel to the division of the<br />
literate faction of society into two separate castes: one, typically male and upper class,<br />
reading for moral and/or social enlightenment and another, typically female, reading for<br />
entertainment. The former caste included those institutional forces that subversively<br />
regulated the circulation of novels through the function of criticism, it is easy to<br />
understand why they typically rejected the novel as a canonical form of literature. Gamer<br />
claims that the “stubbornness” of the reviewers against the Gothic was ideologically<br />
biased and that their ultimate goal was to dismiss it as a valid form of high cultural<br />
production in order to retain dominion on the cultural front:<br />
As guardians of taste in a culture that privileges male over female<br />
writers, poetry over prose, and learned and didactic over popular<br />
literature, reviewers dismiss Gothic writing almost by definition,<br />
since to countenance it is to undermine the very positions of<br />
privilege from which they derive their authority. (42)<br />
This observation echoes the observations made in the first chapter when Plato’s selection<br />
process was deconstructed: critical discourses surrounding the processes of canon-