07.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“dialogue,” rather a unilateral discourse based on assumptions that relied mostly on<br />

stereotypes of gender (65).<br />

105<br />

This stigmatization of the Gothic audience contains a strong ideological bias that<br />

aimed to regulate the production of literature by establishing distinct hierarchies. David<br />

Richter uses Jauss’ theory of reader response to argue that the appearance of the Gothic<br />

novel marked a shift in the pattern of reader response to literature:<br />

The Gothic novel sits astride a major shift … a shift from catharsis<br />

to aesthesis, or in basic English, a shift from reading for<br />

information, and for the sake of entry into a verisimilar world<br />

otherwise inaccessible to the reader, toward reading as an escape<br />

from the world one inhabits into an inner site of fantasy. (112-113)<br />

As briefly mentioned above, this shift in readership runs parallel to the division of the<br />

literate faction of society into two separate castes: one, typically male and upper class,<br />

reading for moral and/or social enlightenment and another, typically female, reading for<br />

entertainment. The former caste included those institutional forces that subversively<br />

regulated the circulation of novels through the function of criticism, it is easy to<br />

understand why they typically rejected the novel as a canonical form of literature. Gamer<br />

claims that the “stubbornness” of the reviewers against the Gothic was ideologically<br />

biased and that their ultimate goal was to dismiss it as a valid form of high cultural<br />

production in order to retain dominion on the cultural front:<br />

As guardians of taste in a culture that privileges male over female<br />

writers, poetry over prose, and learned and didactic over popular<br />

literature, reviewers dismiss Gothic writing almost by definition,<br />

since to countenance it is to undermine the very positions of<br />

privilege from which they derive their authority. (42)<br />

This observation echoes the observations made in the first chapter when Plato’s selection<br />

process was deconstructed: critical discourses surrounding the processes of canon-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!