07.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

while English progressively emerged as the vernacular and slowly evolved into its<br />

modern standardized form. In sixteenth-century England, the overall process of<br />

canonization aimed to establish English as a literary language comparable to Greek and<br />

Latin as well as other pan-European languages such as French—which English<br />

eventually replaced as the primary language of literary production. To that effect, John<br />

Dryden stated that the overall objective of canonization was “to vindicate the honor of<br />

our English writers from the censure of those who unjustly prefer the French before<br />

them,” and it is within this context that John Gower and Chaucer were recognized as the<br />

first canonized English authors according to Sir Philip Sidney (327). Yet amidst the<br />

political implications of nationalistic ideologies, critics and writers still preserved the<br />

Platonic notion that literature should serve educational purposes. In defining Poetry,<br />

Sidney echoes the ancient dictum that its objective is “to teach and delight,” a paradigm<br />

first codified by Horace in his Ars Poetica—“the man who combines pleasure with<br />

usefulness wins every suffrage, delighting the reader and also giving him<br />

advice…(1.344)”—and echoed by legions of critics after him, such as John Dryden,<br />

Samuel Johnson, and Matthew Arnold.<br />

According to Trevor Ross, Ben Jonson’s Workes became “the first self-<br />

consciously canonical edition of an author’s works in English literature (108),” which<br />

marked a shift in thought by valuing individual authors and their work, not the overall<br />

genre (109), and thus the idea of valuing a work on intrinsic value appeared (114). In<br />

light of such conflicting views of literary value, some authors and critics supported the<br />

idea of valuing literature based on popularity with readers (Ross 118), a notion that did<br />

not fail to spark intense scrutiny among neoclassical critics in the ensuing ages and<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!