Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
constantly being mistaken 23 . Yet, as proposed above, these “boring” passages, which<br />
clearly represent the majority of the text, work as “a carefully considered foil to the<br />
violence,” (Murphet 24). While Manguel identifies these boring passages as a sign of<br />
Ellis’ lack of “style” which confirms the book’s sub-literary status, he ignores the fact<br />
that, quite to the contrary, Ellis has structured American Psycho meticulously, and that<br />
the purposes of the novel are in part executed by his stylistic choices. As Marco Abel<br />
argues, “[the novel] is marked by the extent boredom is deployed as a major stylistic<br />
strategy” (143); a point to which Murphet concurs: “If Ellis wants to bore us, he must<br />
have a reason (24).”<br />
166<br />
Murphet argues that the violent incidents are “so confronting and disturbing partly<br />
because they have been so long in coming … and partly because what had remained<br />
latent behind the surface banality is here given such swift and explicit expression that we<br />
are simply unprepared for it (40).” He also contends that stylistically the scenes of sexual<br />
violence situate themselves on a different level than the remainder of the text, which<br />
accentuates their dialectic antagonism and their consequent effect on the reading process:<br />
[t]he violence is not simply a matter of content; it is very much a<br />
matter of form and style. Form, because we have to wait so long<br />
for any signs of literary distinction (the text otherwise being an<br />
object lesson on “bad” writing), that when they finally arrive we<br />
feed on them hungrily, even though they occur in scenes of<br />
abomination; and style, because it is here that the oppressive<br />
paratactic narrative finally ‘lets rip’ and tips over from weightless<br />
indistinction into driven, compulsive syntactical constructions. (45)<br />
23 For instance, when Owen mistakes Bateman for Halberstam (215), or when Carnes, Bateman’s lawyer<br />
thinks he is Davis, not Bateman, and that the person he claims having killed could not be Owen because<br />
Carnes recently saw him in London (387-8).