07.04.2013 Views

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

Untitled - Sexey's School Moodle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

constantly being mistaken 23 . Yet, as proposed above, these “boring” passages, which<br />

clearly represent the majority of the text, work as “a carefully considered foil to the<br />

violence,” (Murphet 24). While Manguel identifies these boring passages as a sign of<br />

Ellis’ lack of “style” which confirms the book’s sub-literary status, he ignores the fact<br />

that, quite to the contrary, Ellis has structured American Psycho meticulously, and that<br />

the purposes of the novel are in part executed by his stylistic choices. As Marco Abel<br />

argues, “[the novel] is marked by the extent boredom is deployed as a major stylistic<br />

strategy” (143); a point to which Murphet concurs: “If Ellis wants to bore us, he must<br />

have a reason (24).”<br />

166<br />

Murphet argues that the violent incidents are “so confronting and disturbing partly<br />

because they have been so long in coming … and partly because what had remained<br />

latent behind the surface banality is here given such swift and explicit expression that we<br />

are simply unprepared for it (40).” He also contends that stylistically the scenes of sexual<br />

violence situate themselves on a different level than the remainder of the text, which<br />

accentuates their dialectic antagonism and their consequent effect on the reading process:<br />

[t]he violence is not simply a matter of content; it is very much a<br />

matter of form and style. Form, because we have to wait so long<br />

for any signs of literary distinction (the text otherwise being an<br />

object lesson on “bad” writing), that when they finally arrive we<br />

feed on them hungrily, even though they occur in scenes of<br />

abomination; and style, because it is here that the oppressive<br />

paratactic narrative finally ‘lets rip’ and tips over from weightless<br />

indistinction into driven, compulsive syntactical constructions. (45)<br />

23 For instance, when Owen mistakes Bateman for Halberstam (215), or when Carnes, Bateman’s lawyer<br />

thinks he is Davis, not Bateman, and that the person he claims having killed could not be Owen because<br />

Carnes recently saw him in London (387-8).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!